Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
You've Created A Bad Character. How, why and whose fault is it?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Reynard" data-source="post: 9308060" data-attributes="member: 467"><p>The purpose of this thread is to more broadly discuss something that came up in the Daggerheart thread.</p><p></p><p>It is possible for a player to create a "bad character" in most games. Here, we will define bad as "doesn't work with the intended method and focus of play" and leave it at that. I am not interested in talking about grizzled loners in ensembles or characters built to push against generally agreed upon limits of good taste etc...</p><p></p><p>First of all, how and why can this happen. There are a few ways, I think:</p><p></p><p>1. Intentional Traps: This is less common that it once was, but not gone. Sometimes designers decide they should include bad choices in characters creation/advancement, just to catch the newbs and "reward system mastery." (Looking at you, Monte.)</p><p></p><p>2. Too many options: This is the same as above, but without the intentionality. there are just lots of options, and not all of them are good, and some explicitly bad, but not because the designers intended it. Maybe they just weren't good at their jobs, or there are so many moving parts it is impossible to know until the game is in the wild.</p><p></p><p>3. Player unfamiliarity: This is probably the most common result. The player just doesn't know what works and what is good and picks stuff because it sounds like the thing they want to do.</p><p></p><p>4. Player intentionality: the player knows something is suboptimal or even bad, and picks it anyway -- probably because it fits their intended theme and character fantasy.</p><p></p><p>5. Randomization: This is very rare these days but still soem games keep it (and some call it a feature). Essentially, die rolls during character creation/advancement lead to a character that is just bad.</p><p></p><p>The more interesting question for me is "Who is responsible?"</p><p></p><p>One thing that came up in the Daggerheart thread is that it can be accidental. That is, no one is responsible. That is certainly possible, especially with character generation, but as time goes on and advancement happens over the course of a campaign, I think that is less and less likely. I think as the campaign goes on, the GM and other players have at least some role to play in mitigating the development of a bad character, since they are also invested in how "good" that character is. Especially if the player of the bad character is new to the game or the hobby, the weight of responsibility is on the rest of the group IMO.</p><p></p><p>But that is just my opinion. I am interested in hearing what other people think. How do you define a "bad character" from a mechanical perspective? What are the potential causes? Who do you think is responsible for making sure a character isn't "bad"? And what are some ways to mitigate the "bad character" if that is really what the player wants to play?</p><p></p><p>A side note: I think it is far easier to create a bad character with more open character generation and advancement rules. Hero, for example, allows the player a huge amount of freedom in creating a character. This means that masters of the system can created very powerful characters within whatever framework is established. But it also means that players can create something near useless (by spreading points to thin or otherwise not being efficient with points). Games with fewer choices tend to make it less likely a character is bad -- unless there are lots of random elements, in which case good or bad is a matter of chance.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Reynard, post: 9308060, member: 467"] The purpose of this thread is to more broadly discuss something that came up in the Daggerheart thread. It is possible for a player to create a "bad character" in most games. Here, we will define bad as "doesn't work with the intended method and focus of play" and leave it at that. I am not interested in talking about grizzled loners in ensembles or characters built to push against generally agreed upon limits of good taste etc... First of all, how and why can this happen. There are a few ways, I think: 1. Intentional Traps: This is less common that it once was, but not gone. Sometimes designers decide they should include bad choices in characters creation/advancement, just to catch the newbs and "reward system mastery." (Looking at you, Monte.) 2. Too many options: This is the same as above, but without the intentionality. there are just lots of options, and not all of them are good, and some explicitly bad, but not because the designers intended it. Maybe they just weren't good at their jobs, or there are so many moving parts it is impossible to know until the game is in the wild. 3. Player unfamiliarity: This is probably the most common result. The player just doesn't know what works and what is good and picks stuff because it sounds like the thing they want to do. 4. Player intentionality: the player knows something is suboptimal or even bad, and picks it anyway -- probably because it fits their intended theme and character fantasy. 5. Randomization: This is very rare these days but still soem games keep it (and some call it a feature). Essentially, die rolls during character creation/advancement lead to a character that is just bad. The more interesting question for me is "Who is responsible?" One thing that came up in the Daggerheart thread is that it can be accidental. That is, no one is responsible. That is certainly possible, especially with character generation, but as time goes on and advancement happens over the course of a campaign, I think that is less and less likely. I think as the campaign goes on, the GM and other players have at least some role to play in mitigating the development of a bad character, since they are also invested in how "good" that character is. Especially if the player of the bad character is new to the game or the hobby, the weight of responsibility is on the rest of the group IMO. But that is just my opinion. I am interested in hearing what other people think. How do you define a "bad character" from a mechanical perspective? What are the potential causes? Who do you think is responsible for making sure a character isn't "bad"? And what are some ways to mitigate the "bad character" if that is really what the player wants to play? A side note: I think it is far easier to create a bad character with more open character generation and advancement rules. Hero, for example, allows the player a huge amount of freedom in creating a character. This means that masters of the system can created very powerful characters within whatever framework is established. But it also means that players can create something near useless (by spreading points to thin or otherwise not being efficient with points). Games with fewer choices tend to make it less likely a character is bad -- unless there are lots of random elements, in which case good or bad is a matter of chance. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
You've Created A Bad Character. How, why and whose fault is it?
Top