Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
You've got physics in my D&D!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Saeviomagy" data-source="post: 1849065" data-attributes="member: 5890"><p>Generally you only don't see an attack coming (ie - are denied your dex bonus to AC and become considered flat-footed) if you are totally and utterly surprised by it.</p><p></p><p>Except in a later post you insulted the guy who argued it with you, and basically said "yeah, well I was right, but I figured he'd just sulk about it anyway" and I pointed out to you that maybe there was a REASON he was sulking, since you seem to think that introducing a rule that means that a character would suddenly be dead is perfectly fair.</p><p></p><p>There is no such thing in 3e as "back to the caster". 3e has dispensed with facing for the sake of rules simplicity. Putting it back in would require you make up a lot of rules to cope with it...</p><p></p><p>Well, given that the spellcaster has to speak in a loud, clear voice, and make gestures that don't even require a spot check to notice, it's probably not going to be that high. Also - shouldn't the free spellcraft check that people get to identify a spell being cast reveal the incoming fireball?</p><p></p><p>And whats to stop that person from shouting out "Incoming fireball!"?</p><p></p><p>Also there's the point that all this adds a lot of extra rolling to the game.</p><p></p><p>Not to mention the fact that what you'll actually be doing is:</p><p></p><p>1. Letting rogues, rangers and monks keep their reflex saves as-is.</p><p></p><p>2. Giving wizards, sorcerors, barbarians, fighters, bards, druids, paladins and clerics a more difficult fortitude save</p><p></p><p>Meaning that</p><p></p><p>All but one of the classes with a good reflex save suffer no change.</p><p></p><p>fighters, paladins and clerics (classes likely to have a good con and a bad dex, as well as a bad reflex save) get the double bonus of having high hitpoints AND a bigger chance of saving against the spell.</p><p></p><p>Barbarians probably end up much the same as they do without the rule - relying on their prodigious hitpoints to survive.</p><p></p><p>Sorcerors and wizards get screwed with a higher save DC, which compounded with their low hitpoints puts them in a worse situation. Except of course that they're the ones throwing the fireballs anyway.</p><p></p><p>Bards just get screwed. They don't have spot, they DO have a good reflex save, and they don't have a good fort save or many hitpoints.</p><p></p><p>In short - the sum effect of having 5 different rolls against a fireball instead of 1 is that bards get screwed. Yay new rule.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Saeviomagy, post: 1849065, member: 5890"] Generally you only don't see an attack coming (ie - are denied your dex bonus to AC and become considered flat-footed) if you are totally and utterly surprised by it. Except in a later post you insulted the guy who argued it with you, and basically said "yeah, well I was right, but I figured he'd just sulk about it anyway" and I pointed out to you that maybe there was a REASON he was sulking, since you seem to think that introducing a rule that means that a character would suddenly be dead is perfectly fair. There is no such thing in 3e as "back to the caster". 3e has dispensed with facing for the sake of rules simplicity. Putting it back in would require you make up a lot of rules to cope with it... Well, given that the spellcaster has to speak in a loud, clear voice, and make gestures that don't even require a spot check to notice, it's probably not going to be that high. Also - shouldn't the free spellcraft check that people get to identify a spell being cast reveal the incoming fireball? And whats to stop that person from shouting out "Incoming fireball!"? Also there's the point that all this adds a lot of extra rolling to the game. Not to mention the fact that what you'll actually be doing is: 1. Letting rogues, rangers and monks keep their reflex saves as-is. 2. Giving wizards, sorcerors, barbarians, fighters, bards, druids, paladins and clerics a more difficult fortitude save Meaning that All but one of the classes with a good reflex save suffer no change. fighters, paladins and clerics (classes likely to have a good con and a bad dex, as well as a bad reflex save) get the double bonus of having high hitpoints AND a bigger chance of saving against the spell. Barbarians probably end up much the same as they do without the rule - relying on their prodigious hitpoints to survive. Sorcerors and wizards get screwed with a higher save DC, which compounded with their low hitpoints puts them in a worse situation. Except of course that they're the ones throwing the fireballs anyway. Bards just get screwed. They don't have spot, they DO have a good reflex save, and they don't have a good fort save or many hitpoints. In short - the sum effect of having 5 different rolls against a fireball instead of 1 is that bards get screwed. Yay new rule. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
You've got physics in my D&D!
Top