Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Morrus" data-source="post: 4482546" data-attributes="member: 1">What makes you think they don't? Is it not possible that the five judges collectively (they ALL vote, you know) might have agreed that the products in question were good products?Or maybe there's an underlying reason why that judge had a positive opinion of a product.  because, just maybe, they were good products, and the judges agreed that this was so.By your logic, any product a judge has seen before and deemed of quality is automatically ineligle for nomination.  Crap, we'd have publishers trying to hide their best work from potential judges, just in case they saw it and formed an opinion!Nobody is blaming podcasts for anything.Again maybe, just maybe, the judges thought those websites were good?  You seem very resistant to the idea that they could have a different opinion to you; and, as an entrant, it's somewhat unseemly to be basing a complaint on what - basically - amounts to "the judges didn't nominate what I think they should have".It's OK for a general voter to express that - expected, even; an entrant trying to find reasons why the products he/she would have preferred be nominated weren't is somewhat questionable.</blockquote>