Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Crothian" data-source="post: 4484170" data-attributes="member: 232">It's very possible that the term objective is being read in different ways.  Perhaps you could explain your point without the term.What I got from Meghan's posts about it (and I could be way off here that's why I'm asking for more information on what people mean) is there would be a predetermined checklist of criteria that determines what is a good book.  If you are just saying that judges should be unbiased then I don't think there is an argument to made against that.  Of course judges should be as unbiased as possible, but we are human so some bias will be there.  Saying that I really like Behind the Spells: Compendium (which I really do) doesn't by itself mean that I am biased towards it and would be biased against books that competed with it.  It just means I really like the book.</blockquote>