Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Tony Vargas" data-source="post: 6738351" data-attributes="member: 996">I'm glad to hear you made an effort, there... &nbsp;This is still not making much sense.&nbsp; An extra ASI hardly seems a must-have feature (it's a call back to 3e fighter bonus feats, the Warlord never got bonus feats), weapons are trivial for the Warlock who has Eldritch Blast, and Rallying Cry would be better as a maneuver than a feature, so players who didn't want that function could skip it, anyway.And that leaves superiority dice mapping to spell slots.&nbsp; Warlock spells are short-rest recharge, just like CS dice.&nbsp; Isn't that the whole point of using it as a template?&nbsp; That still leaves whatever maneuvers you're going to come up with needing to stack up to be reasonably balanced compared to spells of the level the Warlock gets.&nbsp; Not the spells on it's list, obviously, because the focus of the class is so different, but spells of the same level from support classes like the Bard or Cleric...</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Tony Vargas, post: 6738351, member: 996"] I'm glad to hear you made an effort, there... This is still not making much sense. An extra ASI hardly seems a must-have feature (it's a call back to 3e fighter bonus feats, the Warlord never got bonus feats), weapons are trivial for the Warlock who has Eldritch Blast, and Rallying Cry would be better as a maneuver than a feature, so players who didn't want that function could skip it, anyway. And that leaves superiority dice mapping to spell slots. Warlock spells are short-rest recharge, just like CS dice. Isn't that the whole point of using it as a template? That still leaves whatever maneuvers you're going to come up with needing to stack up to be reasonably balanced compared to spells of the level the Warlock gets. Not the spells on it's list, obviously, because the focus of the class is so different, but spells of the same level from support classes like the Bard or Cleric... [/QUOTE]

Verification