Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mesh Hong" data-source="post: 4726543" data-attributes="member: 73463">Yes I agree. If you deviate too far from the range of "expected" stat levels, which if memory serves me right is 13+ 1/2 level then you will get flawed results. The DMG states that a creatures primary stat should be +3, and in 99% of cases I would personally use no more than +4 to keep everything grounded in a consistant approach. The Zombie Abomination in this thread has its primary stat at +6 which is throwing one of its defences slightly. If this was my creature then I would probably have put it a 18 which would have been +4 (just enough to bump its damage slightly as it is a brute solo). It also has one pair of stats that are at -4, which can translate as a slight but potencially significant weakness in a defence, again I might have been inclined to make it -2 which would have improved its Will defence by 1 point. When I comment on someone elses creature I usually accept what ever stats they have given, assuming that is is part of the creature concept. Maybe this is flawed approach from myself and I should comment on the appropriateness of their stats.</blockquote>