Excerpt: Economies [merged]

quindia

First Post

• May 14, 2008

• #1

The Economy Article is Up...

http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/4ex/20080514a

 

log in or register to remove this ad

Boarstorm

First Post

• May 14, 2008

• #2

Excerpt: Economies

http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/4ex/20080514a

 

G

Green Knight

First Post

• May 14, 2008

• #3

They screwed up the monster XP table. They switched the values for Minions and Standard Monsters.

 

D

Dragonblade

Adventurer

• May 14, 2008

• #4

Green Knight said:

They screwed up the monster XP table. They switched the values for Minions and Standard Monsters.

Click to expand...

I noticed that too. Can anyone from WotC pop in and acknowledge whether that error is in the books too? Or just the web excerpt?

 

AZRogue

First Post

• May 14, 2008

• #5

Green Knight said:

They screwed up the monster XP table. They switched the values for Minions and Standard Monsters.

Click to expand...

Yeah. *sigh*

So, do we know if these are copies of the pages as printed? Or is there a chance we're looking at something before it was fully edited?

 

S

Sojorn

First Post

• May 14, 2008

• #6

DEing! Holy !@#$. It IS WoW!

 

F

Fallen Seraph

First Post

• May 14, 2008

• #7

AZRogue said:

Yeah. *sigh*

So, do we know if these are copies of the pages as printed? Or is there a chance we're looking at something before it was fully edited?

Click to expand...

I think it is prior to prints, remember the Giants one. That was corrected and was said to be correct in the books.

 

D

Dragonblade

Adventurer

• May 14, 2008

• #8

Looking at the code, it just looks like an HTML issue. Let's hope so....

 

Boarstorm

First Post

• May 14, 2008

• #9

Residiium sounds interesting. It's nice to get a touch of information on the disenchant and enchant rituals, too.

 

K

Kitirat

First Post

• May 14, 2008

• #10

AZRogue said:

Yeah. *sigh*

So, do we know if these are copies of the pages as printed? Or is there a chance we're looking at something before it was fully edited?

Click to expand...

Lets hope so, that is a pretty easy to see error, lets hope they can be a little better at editing for the final print stuff.

It is only the 3rd article of the ones I have seen which makes me less, instead of more, interested in 4th.

Predefined treasure, exactly written out like that? Not really liking it in principle, but will use as a guideline.