Once, in a WOTC FAQ, I read this question:
"How long is a 5' step for a giant?"
The answer was of course, "5 feet."
All good and right. But...
I was wondering whether it wouldn't be ... right... to let creatures have a LARGER distance they can move and still have a full round worth of actions, depending on HOW LARGE they are. (I.E., since their LEGS are longer, a "pace" for them is probably more than 5 feet)
I was thinking along the lines of "Length of " 5' " step= Creature's Reach", with obvious modifications for creatures whose reach depends on very long necks or arms, not size. (assuming there are any)
How heavy a modification do you think this is? Is it adviseable? Logical? Worth the pain?
Enworld, speak thy truth...
"How long is a 5' step for a giant?"
The answer was of course, "5 feet."
All good and right. But...
I was wondering whether it wouldn't be ... right... to let creatures have a LARGER distance they can move and still have a full round worth of actions, depending on HOW LARGE they are. (I.E., since their LEGS are longer, a "pace" for them is probably more than 5 feet)
I was thinking along the lines of "Length of " 5' " step= Creature's Reach", with obvious modifications for creatures whose reach depends on very long necks or arms, not size. (assuming there are any)
How heavy a modification do you think this is? Is it adviseable? Logical? Worth the pain?
Enworld, speak thy truth...
Last edited: