I'd argue that the ranger threads were just as numerous, if not more. Definitely more numerous than warlord threads are right now. By far.I don't think any other class has ever generated so many threads at once so no wonder people have never complained about them. At one point there were so many that they ended up being cordoned off in their own subforum. If too many more show up, I could see it happening again. I actually found it quite handy, kept all the warlord threads together making it easier to keep up with them.
I'd argue that the ranger threads were just as numerous, if not more. Definitely more numerous than warlord threads are right now. By far.
I've never really felt that, there have definitely been plenty of ranger and sorcerer threads but they never seem to really hit in a large cluster like the warlord threads.I'd argue that the ranger threads were just as numerous, if not more. Definitely more numerous than warlord threads are right now. By far.
There are two, now... but that doesn't stop your point from being made.I notice we have a new class (Mystic) that encompasses numerous psionic archetypes... and yet we only have one thread for discussion of it. A thread where some posters are discussing the mechanics, some discussing the fluff, others are stating their dislike of it, and some are questioning whether psionics should be in the game at all... and yet we only have one thread on the front page about it. Just saying...
You'd be wrong.
There aren't even that many warlord threads right now.
You have the numbers, how many warlord threads are there that have new posts from the last week, and how many active ranger threads were there when they spiked before the revised ranger came out?