/snip
Citation of what? You made specific claims about what I've posted and you didn't show a single example... instead you switched the argument to something totally different (which I knew you'd do) and went off on some other tangent... Show me where I've told warlord fans to shut up, or where I called for a sub-forum for warlords...
You are absolutely right. You never said that directly. I cannot provide a quote for something you never directly said. However, that being said, the implication of this thread and the other two I cited, is pretty clear. If you are right, in this thread, for example, and there isn't any support for a Warlord class, then there is no real point in cluttering up the forums with warlord threads. After all, we're just whistling in the dark. Whether you meant that or not, doesn't really matter. The implication is very much there.
And, you're kinda avoiding the point. We had two threads directly discussing warlords. Then we had three threads discussing the discussion of warlords, rather than discussing them directly. So, who's guilty of cluttering up the forum? Those that want to see a 5e warlord certainly didn't start those three threads.
When more than half the threads discussing a topic are actually not about the topic, but rather discussing whether or not we should be discussing the topic in the first place, who's really the problem here when it comes to spamming threads? I mean, if you look at threads that actually discuss the warlord directly, you don't see all that many. You see kind of overview threads like the first two that I cited, then you see some home-brew threads. Then you get a non-insignificant number of threads like this one questioning whether we should be talking about it at all.
Strip out the threads questioning the validity of talking about warlords in the first place, and suddenly that "bunch of threads" cuts down to a small number.