Strange how only the "american problems" always come into focus. The issues with Curse of Strahd and the vistani are just as worse, but the roma-issue is mostly an european matter and thus no reason for someone on the other side of the atlantic to make a fuss
That's one of the points I was trying to make earlier. If enough people look at fantasy through a real-world filter where every decision to use a stereotype or myth is seen as offensive, then D&D is loaded with potentially offensive material, including some of the European-inspired stuff. People around the world from all origins and skin colors have been stereotyping each other and creating myths about it for as long as there have been myths - this is part of every culture and history. Granted some stereotypes truly are offensive, but most are not. At the time when D&D was created, most of these mythical stereotypes were accepted not as guides to the real world but rather as elements of a fantasy story that made the myths and stories come alive as they did. I don't know anyone who reads "Curse of Strahd", for example, as a guide to real-world Romania or Transylvania or the people therein.
As the next logical step, this is also why I don't subscribe to the group identity stuff. Within my lifetime, I've seen much more of a shift, especially among younger folks, away from seeing people as individuals and instead seeing them as groups. IMHO this is not accurate and it does not have good effects - group identity is a crude low-resolution filter filled with its own stereotypes and assumptions that is forced onto a world that is really at an individual resolution level. The end result of group thinking also results in these crude group assumptions then tend to create assumptions of division and opposition that otherwise would not exist if you instead see things at an individual level.
If identity-wise I considered myself primarily as part of a variety of groups rather than an individual, in every group I could be a part of every person there would still be different from me, with many different experiences, assumptions and characteristics. Sure, there may be some shared assumptions or experiences, but IMHO there are more differences and that's why the individual level is the correct one.