mamba
Legend
yes, but there is a difference between you not knowing that list and WotC not having one. You treat them as the same.You know what is required to build something like a powerful tool that will be built? A list made up of one or (probably) more items in a feature set that needs to be built. If they don't have such a list it's a serious problem.
There is no way that WotC does not have one unless they hired 300 morons. This is the basic level of you telling me that to be a barber you should have a scissor, as if that is something people are generally unaware of.
no, it shouldn’t, they are not building their VTT by committeeIf they do have such a list of gm features it's something that should have been talked about or even partially relayed in text rather than showing a camera swoop of a feature for a totally different set of users (players).
what leaks are you talking about? That link does not feel like it is the correct one, at a minimum I have no idea why it would be relatedDon't forget while accusing me of being impatient that wotc is not known for being a software developer and that we did previously get some leaks about long term plans with the vtt specifically and those leaks were not exactly gm friendly.
They said the DM can override everything, not sure how that is not DM friendly
you not having seen anything is not the same as you not getting anything. You quoted where they said ‘will have’, and you treat it as ‘won’t have’…All of that combined makes it more difficult to pass off the low level gm support problems mentioned in the review as mere alpha problems because we aren't getting anything else at all.
Last edited: