The DMG playtest starts on Playtest 9Possible, but I'm not so sure.
I expect the DMG to be completely different.
Moreover, if subclasses are gonna appear in the DMG, they'd still want to playtest them, wouldn't they?
The DMG playtest starts on Playtest 9Possible, but I'm not so sure.
I expect the DMG to be completely different.
Moreover, if subclasses are gonna appear in the DMG, they'd still want to playtest them, wouldn't they?
Merging the schools doesn't work. There are too many subclass abilities to fit (at least 25 abilities with lots of wordcount). It would take up almost the same pagecount as all 8 subclasses.I remain saddened that the Schools of Wizardry weren't bundled together in one sub with concepts like Bladesinger, War Mage and Scribe moved to the PHB
You'd think, but a lot of people seem wed to the idea of the Monster Manual being a Wildshape option resource.DMG is not the right place for player options, any more than Monster Manual should have animal-themed subclasses in the back.
Considering that wotc has never used villainous NPCs built using the PC rules, I imagine they are going to be quietly retired.Oathbreaker and Death Domain are in the 2014 DMG as Villianous Class Options (p96-97).
So I could see the Villianous Class Options in the DMG be expanded.
WOTC didn't do anything with their DMG. That's why revising it is one of their priorities.Considering that wotc has never used villainous NPCs built using the PC rules, I imagine they are going to be quietly retired.
people can be wrong about more than one thingYou'd think, but a lot of people seem wed to the idea of the Monster Manual being a Wildshape option resource.