I can understand that. Although I don’t mind the shift to more heroic fantasy, I can certainly see that it is there.Because its not just about the capacity for a Wizard to cast those spells. I would bet.
I think it against speaks to over all direction. My view on the game, my view of what the overall setting, structure, feel, tone, of D&D is is not going to match with everyone. This piece of art, is clean. It is powerful, it looks well produced.
It is not gritty, it is not 'real' it is not the Fantasy of my youth.
Now again, I have no issue with the art itself, but I loved Overwatch (even if the Devs failed that game honestly) and I loved MtG to a degree that was unhealthy, and I loved the art and diversity in both.
I can absolutely see however any number of ways this art reflects not so much a shift, but a reinforcement that official D&D is going in a specific direction, and it may not be one that everyone cares for.
do you need it put into words by someone with some articulation talent?
I do not understand this refrence.
5E is fantasy superheroes long before leaving tier 1.Once you get out of Tier 1, 5e is a game of fantasy superheroes.
need to no, but it is helpful in a discussionDo I need what put into words? My answer in brief, is already called out in the text you quoted.
ah not seen that yetIn X-Men ‘97 a Sentinel says it just before Storm absolutely wrecks them with her mutant powers.
need to no, but it is helpful in a discussion
Tastes vary of course, but this to me is still outstanding art.By the by, I like the picture. I like pretty much any and all well drawn/painted fantasy art.
I say this as someone who thinks D&D art peaked at 2E and 3E. Mostly 2E
Never played a tier 1 game that felt like superheroes. Nothing less heroic then getting dropped by a kobold critting you at 2nd level or getting gored by a minotaur at 3rd or 4th level in one strike.5E is fantasy superheroes long before leaving tier 1.