Search results

Or a hybrid set up sorta like what Xeviat put up there: Get a +1 to one of the ability scores for your race (so DX or WS for elves, etc.), and then the +2 comes from your class. Something like: Barbarian: Str, Con or Wis Bard: Cha, Str or Dex Cleric: Wis, Con or by domain Druid: Wis, Int for...

Why do you feel like you need your class to have special out of combat abilities to be involved and useful? A little creativity/resourcefulness goes a long way toward making classes like the fighter or rogue shine. Being the Man with the Plan (MacGuyver!) is more complex and engaging than...

Rapids should be enough of a challenge w/o adding an elemental too the mix. We have a tendency to add the fantastic to make things more dangerous, when navigating white water can be plenty dangerous enough (especially if you don't have someone who is trained/familiar with that stretch of river.)...

Sounds awesome to me, but I'm drinking scotch after a graveyard shift. YMMV

It looks like we are stuck in negative loops, Lokaire: you clearly can't stand 5e (because its not 4e redux), I can't stand your whiny, predictable posts. But, here we are again. Relax. Just play 4e, man. Nobody is going to make you switch. More on topic, I'm not even sure what a defender...

I'm in the military and very aware that fighting is incredibly complex; much more complex than the D&D can accurately model, in fact. I'm also not saying I don't want some crunchy options for combat focused PCs. The problem I have is when you start chasing the nebulous concept of balance. I...

Eh, couldn't care less about class balance in the terms you put forward. Occupies about the same level of interest as "typeface used in table of contents" and "is the bec de corbin a viable weapon for halfling bards?" The thing that folks overlook when making the "complexity disparity" argument...

It is a ton more work to modify a monster than just pulling open a PRD tab on the trusty 'puter. So mostly stock. If they are modified, there is a good reason.

...dark fire shall not avail you, Flame of Udun!

Humans make great fodder.

Sure, a Cimmerian could get plate, and probably wear it well. I just don't think it is being manufactured in Cimmerian villages. The money/resources/demand just isn't there. To use the real world example, plate certainly was in use in 1400, but wasn't made or worn often in the Scottish Highlands.

I would say yes to mail and no to plate. The real work cognates for the Cimmerians and Aesir/Vanir are Celts and vikings, respectively. Neither of those say "Plate wearers" to me. Not to mention taking care of plate in the wilderness being (in theory) a big pain in the ass.

I think there is a ton of "hidden" demand for this: I know it is exactly what I want. The problem (as stated earlier) is the balance: how old school vs. clean mechanics and options. I've messed around with hybridizing as well and it's tricky, but if someone gets it right...they could be onto...

Man, that's a hard one... my first thought would be that it is like porn: I can't define it, but I know it when I see it. A few things stand out, however: -Magic items are rare and dangerous, and not available commercially. -Very much a medieval feel, not steampunk or magic as technology...

That's about where I'm at. I like 3e/ PF, but I miss the feel of AD&D. It would be great if they kept the core rules as meta setting-free as possible. It should be easy to adopt a no magic shop stance (which thankfully is the default right now), or any other change of that ilk, without...

Ranger. Especially 1e.

Experienced DM new to the area looking for laid back folks to play some D&D with. Open to just about any system, but most experience with/know;edge of Pathfinder, 2E, and Castles & Crusades. Hit me up for more info.

Looking for players for a laid back PF game in the metro east area (I live in Fairview Heights). My wife and I are mid 20s and educated, and we're looking for similar folk to play with. PM me here if interested and we'll figure out the details. But really I'll take anybody that can count.

S'mon: What program did you use to make that map? It looks wonderful; just enough info to be useful, little enough so that it is evocative.

One huge risk across many terrain types you are missing is hypothermia. You can become hypothermic if wet at 60 degrees F. So when you look at someplace that has enough rainfall for a forest that isn't jungle, you risk hypothermia. Also, RPGs make travelling in wilderness area risky only in a...