Search results

Hold on, let me check the charts for it. Aha... Hmmm... I see...page 13515... Oh... Yes, go ahead.

I had totally forgotten about the invisible turtle. My DM used to give us extra points for main skills (not combat related, but things like climb, swimming, thievery, etc.) and many for secondary skills (cooking, etc.). I don't recall the exact system, but a ranger usually had enough skill...

It's a matter of getting used to it, but obviously it isn't as fast as D&D (I roll a 18, plus my +7, total 25, do I hit? Yes -> Damage. No -> Next.) but it has its own charm, especially with critical strikes. I think that, at the very end, each player had a copy of his own weapon chart, to...

Rolemaster was the first game I played seriously, with whom I "grew up" in the RPG world, so I owe it a lot. I really can't give that much information like the posters above, but I can say that it can be a fun system. Receiving a critical hit, anxiously waiting for the roll...scary things...

Very true. I checked the fighter's character sheet and he missed it too. I took it into account for the rogue (dagger), but forgot about this one.

But just remember that : So, if you are wielding a frost weapon, the [cold] keyword doesn't get added. Now, if you turn the damage into cold damage (with the power) then you do. It's just a minor point, but it's important to keep in mind for other weapons.

Poorly built? He really can't go higher at the moment unless he had gone for 18 strength, gimping his armor/wisdom. Which feat should have he choosen then? Lethal Hunter is one more extra damage, same as two weapon fighting, which opens +1 AC/Reflex defense feat.

I may have to fork this even, but I disagree. One of my players is playing (redundancy) a dwarven fighter with strength 18, wielding a great axe, with the Dwarven weapon training feat. The other player is an elven ranger, with strength 16, using a long sword and as feat, two weapon combat. I...

I see... The Swordmage looks good, but I think it has too many area spells.

I just finished the first part of a dungeon starring cannibal elves and halflings. The PCs did not expect it and their racial encounter powers are really great for enemies. Many halfling stouts (minions) survived thanks to the second chance, while many misses turned hits with Elven accuracy.

It seems that is possible.

PC Kobolds do not get dark vision. It says "Vision : Normal". Drows do though.

That's why I was reluctant to use the word "terrorist". Let's go back to the basic thingy. From the PHB : Change is not good, nor bad, it's something neutral. Although when it's for good, people like to call it change, when it's bad, people call it crisis. Freedom, trade, travel and adventure...

Where did I say that? I'm talking about self-called "Freedom fighters", both in real and fantasy environments, not what do I percieve of the concept of freedom. The only one personal thought I'm implying is that I dislike the "fighting for freedom is always good" thingy.

Yeah, that cloak is way too long to be comfortable or useful. Dollar Bill had a similar one and he still regrets it...

Terrorists and bandits* have always stated that they were fighting for freedom. If humans invade goblin lands and harass them, would be evil if goblins started to kill civilians in order to "soothe" the pressure? They are fighting for freedom, even if they are not good at heart. *Not bandits...

I disagree. Avandra also says that change is inevitable and encourages people fighting back at those who try to take your freedom. Where you see "revolution for the good" I see anarchy. No respect for the stablished order or hierarchy isn't what a good god should encourage. Again, my...

EN[War of the]World[s]?

Don't forget about extra damage from critical strikes. A human berserker adds d12 with a critical strike.

Elven accuracy for those daily spells seem very, very good.