Search results

This is so true that it's not even funny. And I actually like the fact that someone went and tried to show an anti-caster class that works in combat to some extent without any real fear of butthurt casters jumping at him. Though judging from some of the stuff on the first page, that already...

My D&D group has tried out both 3.5 and Pathfinder, and they HAVE noticed the feat problems even before I linked that thread to them. What annoyed me was that another DM I know scoffed off EVERY argument they had by just saying "those guys are trolls". They're not trolls, they presented valid...

I find this idea original (and interesting, of course) enough for me to want to try it with one of my characters. Now I just need to convince my group (especially the DM) that this won't be too overpowered. (or wait for the final version of this class)

That link has all that you need to know. I would have said that stuff myself, but I was too tired and thankfully Frank had already done a better job than I would have done with my own analysis.

I picked Rogue, though Paladin is a close second. As for non-core, my vote would have gone to Warlock, without a doubt.

That sounds like something that some parties will roll with and others will just ignore. If that WOULD be used, I'd say it would be allowed for at least the melee classes, because they really have use for BAB and such. (And because I'd take EVERY opportunity to power up melee classes anyway)...

I can only wonder why poisonmaking needs it's own Craft checks when it can just be Alchemy. I mean, when you think about it, wouldn't it make sense that the same checks used for making chemical mixtures of all sorts would apply to poisons (which are chemicals in their own right) as well? Also...

Firstly, someone could define Low Fantasy, because it would help with giving more examples and such. Also, I have heard many times that many people do not want to play Low Fantasy in D&D, because it doesn't work in it very well. (At least, that's what they say)

I wonder who's bright idea was it to automatically associate chains with evil. Next thing you know they say min-maxers are evil because they took the Spiked Chain for many builds, or that anyone who is into some chain fetishes is also automatically evil. (Of course, this post is a joking one. I...

Okay, for the first. I already said why I was being edgy. It was because on another forum (composed primarily of 3.5 fans) we already had so many random troll attacks by PF and 4e fans that I felt like they were all out to just call 3.x games with random slews of profanity, and that mind-set...

Is it somehow wrong to ignore official word and instead go with house rules? My two answers, short and long. The short answer is "No.", and the long answer is "Noooooooooooooooooooo.".

Considering how I see the two pre-requisite feats that LEAD to Spring Attack as being relatively weak, my longer answer for this question would be that it depends on your willingness to take two "inferior" feats for the sake of one rather strong one. Basically that means that Spring Attack is...

My bad then. Apologies for the misunderstanding. I had faced the kind of people I talked about a few days ago and I was starting to get tired with it, hence the edgy reaction.

Probably because he presented himself in a manner that made me (and concerro) feel like he was slamming 3.x down in an unfair manner. I myself GAVE an answer to the OP already (this is the second time I have to say about that now...), and then I noticed what gamerprinter had written and reacted...

More overly subjective stuff I see here, which (in my view) is almost deliberately trying to make 3.x look bad and trying to make Pathfinder look FAR BETTER THAN IT IS. I have tried both, and I have my own opinions, but I choose NOT to shove them in people's face. I will refer to my earlier post...

I assume that was the idea of what Professor Cirno had posted. His post immediately went back to how 3.x was imbalanced/broken, though there was an argument between two guys just a few pages ago. I've already given my views concerning the actual topic, so I do not feel like repeating myself. I...

Just a random question: Can this be used in a 3.5 game, or does it need some tweaking before conversion? Also, I gotta say I have always like classes like this. The 3.5 Marshal felt like it was lacking, and I never really was convinced with the 4e Warlord either. And this SORT OF reminds me of...

I do not mean to offend by this, AshtenD, but I find your post to be overly subjective when it comes to comparing 3.X and PF. I found no trouble alternating between the two, and even now I actually prefer 3.X games over PF ones. And if I actually had the time and patience, I would start to...

I know actual 2nd edition players who never really complained that way. Besides, when editions change, there will ALWAYS be people who will complain, and some of those complaints will be justified. This applies to 4e as well. Anyway, getting back on topic. This topic seems to be a rather...

May I ask exactly for what purpose are you looking for such a monster?