pukunui
Legend
Yes but did he wear plate when he was acting as a barbarian? I've just started reading The Complete Chronicles of Conan and I get the impression that he only wore heavy armor in his role as king of a 'medieval' realm. Most of the time he doesn't seem to wear any armor at all. In fact, the color illustration at the beginning of the book shows him bare-chested with loose pants and boots.But Conan has worn plate armor too.
Furthermore, most of the barbarians depicted in the playtest document are either lightly armored or unarmored as well (eg. the leaping woman - a modified version of which I am using for my PC, incidentally). The only two with any kind of heavy armor - the dragonborn and the human killing the gnoll - only have it piecemeal... which, of course, isn't even an option in 4e (not that it was an option in 3e either).
My point is that not only is the "classic" barbarian depicted as lightly/unarmored, but so too are the barbarians WotC is showing us in their very own playtest document ... yet this sort of look & feel is not a very plausible option with the mechanics as they are now. The barbarians shown in the playtest document are just asking to get killed. There's nothing in the mechanics that suggests you can play an unarmored Conan-style barbarian and expect to survive for very long.
Last edited: