tetsujin28
First Post
You're welcome It's a fascinating subject.Piratecat said:As a moderator, I just wanted to say a quick thank you to everyone who has kept this thread focused, interesting and on topic. I'm really pleased.
You're welcome It's a fascinating subject.Piratecat said:As a moderator, I just wanted to say a quick thank you to everyone who has kept this thread focused, interesting and on topic. I'm really pleased.
The Secret History (Yuan Ch'ao Pi Shi) is reasonably informative in that respect, though it is an incomplete picture. The impression it gives is that there wasn't much in the way of a distinct religious life, but that interactions with spirits were thought to be relatively important in daily experience. Mönke Tengri, the Eternal Sky, the Eternal Heavens, is particularly prominent, and the Genghisids clearly thought of that power as being their patron (it's an open question whether that's Chinese influence or the Chinese notion of Heaven as the patron of the ruler came from Central Asia). For examples of shamans, you don't have to look much farther than Teb Tengri.tetsujin28 said:The ancient beliefs of the Mongols (and the entirety of Central Asia) is pretty much impossible to reconstruct.
Again, though, we have no proof. The extensive material and belief culture surrounding shamanism doesn't show up until the the 18th century. Saying they were 'pagan' is fine. Saying they were 'shamans' is not. All we can really say about Teb Tengri is that he was a magico-religious practitioner. The fact that until the early boom in Russian research on Mongolian and Tungusic beliefs, Teb Tengri was not referred to as a shaman ('priest' is the more usual word), is telling.tarchon said:For examples of shamans, you don't have to look much farther than Teb Tengri.
Well, everything I've ever read about Mongolian culture unreservedly refers to the traditional boo as a shaman, very distinctly from Lamaist-Buddhist clergy. Thus I'm assuming you're using some definition different from that used by most people who write about Mongolian culture. In such case, not being familiar with the wealth of redefinitions of common terms proposed in anthropology books, I can't really argue about it either way.tetsujin28 said:Again, though, we have no proof. The extensive material and belief culture surrounding shamanism doesn't show up until the the 18th century. Saying they were 'pagan' is fine. Saying they were 'shamans' is not. All we can really say about Teb Tengri is that he was a magico-religious practitioner. The fact that until the early boom in Russian research on Mongolian and Tungusic beliefs, Teb Tengri was not referred to as a shaman ('priest' is the more usual word), is telling.
Timmundo said:Well you probably already have thought of this, while a good deal of Europe was in the process of being converted to Christianity, most of the less well educated people kept up with a portion of the previous beliefs as well.
Agback said:Not just the less-educated. Nearly all of mediaeval medicine was an application of the magical beliefs of the Greeks and Romans. In fact, reading about the history of medicine it strikes me that the fantasy stereotype of the wizard (tomes, speaking words of power, weird ingredients, astrology, geometric diagrams, robes embroidered with astrological symbols and Arabic script) might well be based on the mediaeval doctor. And doctors were trained at universities.
kirinke said:And actually, alot of scientists now think that the 'witch craze' thing was due to naturally occuring hallucinogenics found in spoiled bread.