Why would I know this? I've interacted with you in two threads now.
When I make a point, and then make an aside, and you respond vehemently to the aside, then we can tell you're dodging the point. You might be fooling yourself, but not anyone else.
While there is a difference between "censored by the government" and "censored by society", either way the end is the same, your voice is not heard.
Go on, tell Boris Pasternak and Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn that being imprisoned is the same outcome as being disinvited as a convention's Guest of Honor. Tell Derek Black that widespread social disapproval of Stormfront has the same outcome as a government-enforced shut-down of Stormfront. You've demonstrated your ratio of ideology to objective reality; from here on, the rest is trivial.
Because all of that happebed to the developers at CDPR
Strong claims require strong evidence. Where's your evidence of anyone sending death threats, rape threats, or doxxing personal information? I'm aware of one attempt to squeeze money out of CDPR, via a threat of publishing their game content. That's not the same as what happened to Felicia Day or Leslie Jones, neither in kind nor in volume.
Not everyone throwing hate at Tran (and the others) is Right. I'm sure there are plenty of lefties throwing as much hate at her (and the others) for no good reason (because that's how people operate).
Strong claims require strong evidence. "I'm sure" and "that's how people operate" are not strong evidence.
I followed that link you provided, about the "Amended Act on the Institute of National Remembrance". The details provided in that link don't match your summary. On one hand, the Polish Minister of Justice said "There will be no punishment for witnesses of history, scholars or journalists who quote painful facts from our history." Such a reassuring declaration! On another hand, if you watch whether the walk matches the talk - it doesn't. There's already a case in progress, against an Argentine newspaper, Pagina 12, for an article about the Jedwabne pogrom, a 1941 massacre of more than 300 Jews by their Polish neighbors during the Nazi occupation.
In the Polish Nationalist version of the Official Story, anything bad was done entirely by either the occupying Reich, or by the subsequent Soviet occupation, and there's not a drop of blood on Poland's collective hands. The ruling Polish nationalist party isn't tolerating divergence from the Official Story. Oh, those pesky historical facts, they so often conflict with Official Stories...
Don't care either as it isn't something I find to be a worrying absence.
Wow. So you don't see any importance, in whether Geralt considers the life of a non-Polish human as equal in value to the life of a Polish human. Well then. Some Polish people, in Warsaw under the Reich, shared your opinion, and did not find the disappearance of Turks, Roma, Jews, etc. to be a worrying absence. I guess those particular Poles grew up on stories like The Witcher. Meanwhile, other Polish individuals, such as the Jan and Antonina Żabiński, acted on... shall we say... different values than yours. They saw non-Polish humans as people whose lives mattered, whose absence would be worrying. See also, "Black Panther", in which T'challa compromises the NO OUTSIDERS rule, in order to save a white man's life.
If you can't see the difference between a story which portrays ethno-nationalism as a flawed ideology, with tragic outcomes, an ideology which the hero questions and defies;
versus a story which wallows in ethno-nationalism;
if you accuse me of hypocrisy, for supporting the former, and not the latter;
then I have nothing further to say, because you already can't listen.