• The VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!

TSR Companies & Freelancers Distance Themselves From The New TSR

The new TSR (which I refer to as TSR3 to avoid confusion) has doubled down on its stance--which has been widely condemned online--via an ongoing series of tweets and replies from its TSR Games, Giantlands, and Dungeon Hobby Museum social media accounts (possibly operated by Justin LaNasa) in an astonishing PR campaign which makes the original interview which sparked off the controversy look...

The new TSR (which I refer to as TSR3 to avoid confusion) has doubled down on its stance--which has been widely condemned online--via an ongoing series of tweets and replies from its TSR Games, Giantlands, and Dungeon Hobby Museum social media accounts (possibly operated by Justin LaNasa) in an astonishing PR campaign which makes the original interview which sparked off the controversy look mild in comparison. Various entities are moving to distance themselves from the company and its activities, including TSR2, the company founded in 2011 by Jayson Elliot, which has now declared that it will not be using the name TSR any longer. Other companies including Gen Con and freelancers such as Jeff Dee have also made statements.

For reference -- TSR1 is the (no longer existing) company which launched D&D in 1974, TSR2 is the company founded by Jayson Elliot in 2011 to create Gygax Magazine and which currently publishes the Top Secret RPG, and TSR3 is the newly launched company.



Catch up on my previous coverage of this story:


TSR3's social media accounts initially sought to distance the company from Ernie Gygax's statements, but within a few hours had reversed course and doubled down on his stance. Note that there have been dozens of social media posts from the company over the last few days, and still continuing as I type this, and I don't intend to share them all here.

(Thanks to Daniel Fox for sharing screenshots below via Twitter).

Screen Shot 2021-06-27 at 10.19.46 PM.png

tsr_distance.jpeg

tsr3_gyg.jpeg


Screen Shot 2021-06-27 at 10.00.40 PM.png

tsr3dis.jpeg

Screen Shot 2021-06-27 at 11.44.54 PM.png

Screen Shot 2021-06-27 at 11.45.42 PM.png

uROPf5GL_400x400.jpg

TSR2 -- "Update to our earlier tweet - we will NOT be licensing anything from the new company claiming rights to the TSR logos. We are not working with them in any fashion."

Gen Con -- "Gen Con is not associated with TSR Games and we don't support their recent statements. While the foundation of Gen Con is tied with the history of TTRPGs, our goal is to build off the good, acknowledge the bad, and work toward a present free from racism, misogyny, and homophobia."

Gen Con has also indicated that they do not intend to allow TSR3 at the convention.

gencon.jpeg

GAMA (the Game Manufacturers Association) -- "We’re aware of the appalling statements published by TSR Games and their founder - GAMA does not condone nor agree with any part of it. We pride ourselves on supporting and promoting inclusivity always. Our motto is “A game at every table, a table for everyone”. Transphobia, racism, and sexism will not be tolerated. That means that TSR is not welcome at Origins Game Fair, GAMA Expo or any event affiliated with our organization."

Jeff Dee -- "There is a rumor going around that I am part of this new TSR company. That is not accurate. I have done some work for them as a freelance artist. That’s how I make my living, and spreading the misinformation that I’m now employed full-time by one particular client could stop other clients from approaching me and hurt my business. So, please do not spread that rumor. If I ever become a full-time employee anywhere again, I will announce that myself. Thanks. UPDATE: After investigating reports about statements made by representatives of this new TSR, I have determined that I can no longer do business with them in good conscience. I've returned their downpayment on the next piece of art I was scheduled to do for them. And yeah, I could sure use some new commissions to make up for this big hit on my cashflow"

Jim Ward, an original TSR alumnus and who wrote Giantlands, TSR3's flagship product -- "At the present time I know little or nothing about the relaunch of TSR. Right now I don't see how anyone could pick up where the old company left off. Yes it's a name with some logos, that is all I know."

Luke Gygax -- "FYI- I am not involved with any TSR company nor is Gary Con nor anyone else in my family outside of Ernie. Full stop. That is all ... I have reasons for distancing myself. The way TSR treats people online in their public exchanges is rude. The museum is a for profit business and was asking for donations. Using names of people to promote without their knowledge. Going out of the way to talk gender/woke stuff ... Also basically jacking the TSR logo from Jayson Elliot. The bombastic press releases and claims to old IP. Making a quick nostalgia money grab based on my fathers name and not much else. So I’m making it clear I don’t like this style and I have ZERO to do with TSR"

Screen Shot 2021-06-27 at 10.16.53 PM.png

TSR3 responds to Luke Gygax

Tim Kask, an original TSR alumnus who worked at the company until 1980, spoke at length on this topic in a YouTube video (below). I've transcribed some bits, but he says a whole load more (ellipses represent sections I have not included, for reasons of brevity), so check out the video for the whole thing.

"There has been bandied about in social media over the last several days several claims about what's going on in Lake Geneva right now. Ernie Gygax made a most egregious mistake in an interview he did on a podcast. He basically waved his bare ass in front of everybody that's concerned about pronouns, and woke, and all that right now in the industry and thumbed his nose at them. The transcript of his podcasts are there for everyone to read. That they were men, and they didn't give a sh*t, and la la la.

But right there they alienated three quarters of the gaming industry. Probably more than that, I don't believe that there's a quarter of the gaming industry that still are the neanderthals that he would make us out to be.

That's another thing. This whole thing has brought the OSR (the old school revival) into serious disrepute. Now there are some little Karens going on some of the social media and painting with the same brush all of us that were there back then based on the stupid ass sh*t that Ernie just said. No. We weren't all like that. And we aren't all like that now. He's a troll, a troglodyte, a neanderthal, if he really means that. It's a foolish person that doesn't wet his finger once in a while and feel the wind shift.

Now there've been claims in a couple of posts, one of which is by Ernie, about how the stalwarts, the old TSR are flocking to the banner. Bullsh*t....

... There is no one of the creative side of TSR from the early days involved with the Dungeon Hobby Shop Museum. No one. Not one creative person. No matter who might be claiming what, they simply do not have the credentials. Being named DiMaggio does not mean you can hit a lot of home runs. Or that you even hit any home runs ....

... Just because you say you're TSR doesn't mean you are."


 

log in or register to remove this ad

Zardnaar

Legend
And they'd still be wrong for doing that kind of generalisation. I didn't misunderstand anything, I disagreed with the (racist) conclusion arrived at, by my own grandfather who gave me his medals no less. Great person on an individual level, bad at race due to trauma. We contain multitudes.

I think the war generation got a free pass on Germans and Japanese.

My grandmother was not impressed in 1992 when we had a Japanese girl stay with us.

But they lived through that era, saw what happened either first hand or heard about it directly and brothers, boyfriend's etc didn't come home or if they did may not have been intact.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Sacrosanct

Legend
Funny thing about the internet. Conversations don't happen in a vacuum, and while conversations in this thread stay in this thread, we have access to the various participant's views outside of this thread, and even outside of this forum. I will not paste quotes, links, or anything else from a member here to what they might have said somewhere else. That's bad form in general, and probably against the rules (if not, I'm sure the mods would not want that headache).

I'll only say this. If you (general you) have said some really abhorrent things elsewhere you know you would never say here because you'd get banned in a heartbeat, you shouldn't expect people to take what you say here with the benefit of the doubt and thus shouldn't act all surprised or offended when people don't believe or want to engage you, even if what you've said on this site isn't necessarily all that problematic. Context matters. If you've (again, general you here) call LGBTQ people mentally deficient on your FB page or wherever else, I'll just ignore you outright even if you've never said anything like that here.
 


Dannyalcatraz

Schmoderator
Staff member
Supporter
To be honest, they don't really look much like real Black women at all. The only comparable feature is the realistic skin tone - their other features are more in line with white models.
Take a closer look at us. Please. There’s a whole continent of variations.

Hell…just look at the black supermodels of the past 30 years.
 

Zardnaar

Legend
Take a closer look at us. Please. There’s a whole continent of variations.

Hell…just look at the black supermodels of the past 30 years.

I have this game Europa Universalist IV. Set in 1444.

Has a lot of African kingdoms to play and whenever I play a nation I'm unfamiliar with I go and read up on it.

You can play as Mali or Songhai, Makuria, Morocco, Ethiopia, Kilwa etc. And the various Indian kingdoms etc. I've played all those nations so read up on them.

Not everything is there eg can play as Hawaii but it's very sandbox based.

It is fun doing reverse colonization in the UK for example as Africa/India.

Arkeo on Amazon prime is also really good. Covers a few places that get less coverage. It touches on the usual suspects eg Rome/Greece/Inca etc but it covers a wide variety of civilizations.

Not looking at architecture and terrain for D&D idea either totally not.
 

One could argue that, but one would look pretty silly doing so. Similarly, that there have been individual evil women in myth and legend (and for that matter in history) is a bit beside the point. This isn't about mapping Elizabeth Bathory or Ishtar onto some baddie elves; it's the trope of a mythic topsy-turvy place where - unlike the natural order of things in normal society! women are in charge, and they are pretty hostile and awful to men. Certainly that is far from a modern trope per se, but the particular version the drow have sure is. (I'm fairly sure it was Joanna Russ who described this type of plot as 'the captive will be my consort for tonight, said Queen Zar coldly'.)
Silly? Oops. Well we are no longer in discourse, rather you have an agenda provable at all costs.

So, my parting remarks, and last ones, are these: The Amazons. Familiar? Parse it.
Go forward and study the Lost Civ fictions. Haggard (She), Merritt (various) in particular. Parse those. oh yes, "She" may frighten you as Imperialistic literature, but stripping that out, you might find some more signs of the Matriarchy, which has been fast-forwarded from, as I've said, ancient times, tis why I started with the Amazons.

Nice talking in passus. I am back to the Great Hunt.
 

Actually, one could argue that Matriarchy and Patriarchy have been changing back and forth forever over ancient times.
?

Please elucidate. Because it's my understanding that when matriarchy is portrayed (by men), that it is - mythographically speaking - as a cautionary tale; usually with dire moral consequences.

I'm pretty confident that patriarchy has been in the firm ascendant since at least the Neolithic Revolution, and probably before. But I'm certainly amenable to having my views on the subject changed.

However, there were quite a lot of evil women in myth and legend just as there were lots of evil men in myth and legend, so I don't find those placements significant to anything but the human condition when studying such texts.

Interesting. Because it's my understanding that when "evil women" are portrayed in myth, it is generally as a seductress and/or as a foil to the heroic male protagonist. Could you give some examples of where this isn't the case?
 


Zardnaar

Legend
?

Please elucidate. Because it's my understanding that when matriarchy is portrayed (by men), that it is - mythographically speaking - as a cautionary tale; usually with dire moral consequences.

I'm pretty confident that patriarchy has been in the firm ascendant since at least the Neolithic Revolution, and probably before. But I'm certainly amenable to having my views on the subject changed.



Interesting. Because it's my understanding that when "evil women" are portrayed in myth, it is generally as a seductress and/or as a foil to the heroic male protagonist. Could you give some examples of where this isn't the case?

Patriarchy was explained to me thus.

"When one gender can easily beat the other to death".

Original D&D group all the players came from broken homes apart from one.

Hf of the broken home players had domestic violence.

The one player with both parents they got divorced once the kids left home.
 


Related Articles

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top