KrazyHades
First Post
Do you allow bonuses on a magic bow (say, a +1 flaming bow) and a set of arrows (say, +1 sonic arrows) to get 1d6 fire+1d6 sonic+2?
shilsen said:I play it by the RAW, which means the flaming and sonic would stack but the enhancement bonuses would overlap.
One of the best changes in 3.5 was to disallow the enhancement bonuses from stacking.KrazyHades said:Do you allow bonuses on a magic bow (say, a +1 flaming bow) and a set of arrows (say, +1 sonic arrows) to get 1d6 fire+1d6 sonic+2?
I'm a rather traditional bow user which means:kigmatzomat said:MC is 3.0 and RAW so yes, darn it. On the flip side, bows break oh so very easily when huge monsters target them.
Shin Okada said:I don't feel any need for letting two enhancement bonuses stack.
If you allow it, you will soon see clerics start to cast Greater Magic Weapon on both Bow and Arrows and give incredibly high total bonus to archers.
Shin Okada said:If you allow it, you will soon see clerics start to cast Greater Magic Weapon on both Bow and Arrows and give incredibly high total bonus to archers.
green slime said:Which is the real problem, and not the actual stacking itself. The ease by which GMW totally removes the need for purchased magical arrows.
I allow the ammunition to stack, together with the bow or xbow.
But I have changed magical weapon and to GMW only affect a single piece of Ammunition.
With this simple rule enforced, once again, a set of 12 +3 arrows becomes a valued treasure.