evilbob
Explorer
...But you do target a foe with the spell. Or rather, you may intentionally roll the spell into an area that includes an enemy, at which point they must make a reflex save or take damage. That isn't technically "targeting" the foe, to use the word how it is most often used in these spell descriptions - but at the same time, that's exactly what you're doing.Vegepygmy said:...you don't target the spell on a foe...
...Well, unless you include a foe in the effect of the spell. Which you can do, after it is cast, to cause damage.Vegepygmy said:...and the Effect it creates does not include a foe.
I agree that there is a really hard case for a RAW settlement of this on either side, and the technicality seems to side with not breaking invis. However, I believe that the intent seems to indicate that a directly offensive action would break the spell. Rolling your ball of fire into someone seems directly offensive.
This may just boil down to an intent debate, which really can't be solved. But more opinions are welcome.