No. Just pointing out that "...it's neither common, nor uncommon. Its circumstantial," is rather like saying, "useful statistics cannot be drawn," which I believe to be flatly incorrect.
Well my counter point was that a broad statistic like that isn't useful either. Planetary % chance of getting hurt by farm animal regardless of activity isn't even close to precise. Some context matters. At least apply a category filter as I indicated with Vets vs. Farmers and their likelyhood of getting hurt respectively.
otherwise, your original point made it sound like farm animals were super dangerous. They're not safe, but the % chance of injury isn't that high, depending on the context.