edhel
Explorer
What do you think: Do you get a 50% miss chance and be flat-footed if you grapple an opponent you don't see?
This situation occured in my campaign when a player was grappling an invisible foe.
I ruled that you don't get the miss chance unless you're attacking the foe with a weapon in grapple. It seemed logical that, even though being invisible while grappling might give you some advantage, you know where your opponent is.
Also, what if the invisible opponent had had sneak attack? Could've he used it? (And can you feint in a grapple?)
.: edhel
P.S We also made a house rule after a grapple with a disguised medusa. The rules state that you can prevent a pinned opponent from speaking so I decided that you could cover the opponents eyes or turn his head away. This was to prevent the petrificating gaze of the medusa.
And covering the eyes wouldn't make the opponent blinded, it was just for to prevent the gaze. More like preventing eye contact.
This situation occured in my campaign when a player was grappling an invisible foe.
I ruled that you don't get the miss chance unless you're attacking the foe with a weapon in grapple. It seemed logical that, even though being invisible while grappling might give you some advantage, you know where your opponent is.
Also, what if the invisible opponent had had sneak attack? Could've he used it? (And can you feint in a grapple?)
.: edhel
P.S We also made a house rule after a grapple with a disguised medusa. The rules state that you can prevent a pinned opponent from speaking so I decided that you could cover the opponents eyes or turn his head away. This was to prevent the petrificating gaze of the medusa.
And covering the eyes wouldn't make the opponent blinded, it was just for to prevent the gaze. More like preventing eye contact.