I don’t especially see how being an aasimar really effects much of anything about what i said, especially given i stated i was going right over ignoring the aspect of the divine associated colour design, even if they are an aasimar if they’re a wizard casting wizard magic their magic should look like a wizard is casting it.She could be an Aasimar, even though they aren't covering Aasimar in the PHB. After all, not all Aasimar have blonde hair and blue eyes.
So Saruman the White, Gandalf the White, one third of all the wizards on Krynn, and any wizard wearing a Robe of the Good Archmagi are not wearing proper uniform?I like the art, it’s cool art, but it doesn’t feel wizard to me, skipping right over the fact that white and gold together are much more associated as divine colours, between the glowing eyes, all the floating (herself, her staff AND the surrounding books) and the pose, this all feels way too wild and unrestrained to feel like it embodies DnDs presented concept of wizard who mastered this magic through extensive study and learning and who has it under their complete control, this feel more like a sorcerer channeling sheer raw power for their purposes.
I'm of the idea that some aspects of a spellcaster's personality and background do influence and resonate with how their magic appears, even in the "magical science" such as wizardry.I don’t especially see how being an aasimar really effects much of anything about what i said, especially given i stated i was going right over ignoring the aspect of the divine associated colour design, even if they are an aasimar if they’re a wizard casting wizard magic their magic should look like a wizard is casting it.
It is official that individuality alters the appearance of spells, such as Spell Thematics in Tashas.I'm of the idea that some aspects of a spellcaster's personality and background do influence and resonate with how their magic appears, even in the "magical science" such as wizardry.
I never said that, but you can’t deny that white and gold together have long been used in reference to divine forces.So Saruman the White, Gandalf the White, one third of all the wizards on Krynn, and any wizard wearing a Robe of the Good Archmagi are not wearing proper uniform?
I think you’ve been playing to much MtG mate!
Sure but there’s also a limit isn’t there? So like i said, the divine colour isn’t even the main issue, the use of the magic feels way too wild and unrestrained for a wizard.I'm of the idea that some aspects of a spellcaster's personality and background do influence and resonate with how their magic appears, even in the "magical science" such as wizardry.
More likely someone stepped through a portal and visited 1980s Earth. Ever see Dynasty?And as far as the shoulder pads go - fashion does stupid things. Maybe some recent queen in her setting had weak shoulders and now anyone who's anyone wears stupid shoulder pads to emulate her. In the real world
More likely someone stepped through a portal and visited 1980s Earth. Ever see Dynasty?
And there's going to be separate art for the Evoker, Diviner, Illusionist and Abjurer as well!The biggest part that I don't get about this whole argument is: This is just one wizard out of all the wizards in all the worlds of D&D. To me, that means that she could look like just about anything anyone could ever possibly choose to roll-up as their PC. She certainly fits into THAT.