S Shayuri First Post Feb 22, 2011 #62 Alright...I'm seeing a warmage in the mix...and a ranger. So firepower probably isn't an issue. I'll go with the Beguiler concept, to give us some subtlety and sneakery. And of course, a good 'face.'
Alright...I'm seeing a warmage in the mix...and a ranger. So firepower probably isn't an issue. I'll go with the Beguiler concept, to give us some subtlety and sneakery. And of course, a good 'face.'
Leif Adventurer Feb 23, 2011 #63 Shayuri said: Alright...I'm seeing a warmage in the mix...and a ranger. So firepower probably isn't an issue. I'll go with the Beguiler concept, to give us some subtlety and sneakery. And of course, a good 'face.' Click to expand... Don't forget SAMURAI! Beguilers are very cool! I might have played more of them in the past if I had remembered to look in PH2 when making characters. As it happens, though, I've only played ONE before.
Shayuri said: Alright...I'm seeing a warmage in the mix...and a ranger. So firepower probably isn't an issue. I'll go with the Beguiler concept, to give us some subtlety and sneakery. And of course, a good 'face.' Click to expand... Don't forget SAMURAI! Beguilers are very cool! I might have played more of them in the past if I had remembered to look in PH2 when making characters. As it happens, though, I've only played ONE before.
Beguilers are very cool! I might have played more of them in the past if I had remembered to look in PH2 when making characters. As it happens, though, I've only played ONE before.
