Proposed fix for spellcaster multiclassing

[RangerWickett]

So do we have a finalized version we can show to Paizo, now that they have the 'intense arcane playtest' going on?

 

[Nikosandros]

So do we have a finalized version we can show to Paizo, now that they have the 'intense arcane playtest' going on?

Was anything submitted to Paizo?

 

[RangerWickett]

Nope, sorry. I lost my interest in Pathfinder as a ruleset.

 

[Nikosandros]

Nope, sorry. I lost my interest in Pathfinder as a ruleset.

Well, I'm still grateful to you and Wulf for the ideas in this thread.

 

[Wulf Ratbane]

I'm still planning to have something in Trailblazer, and I definitely took away some good ideas from this thread.

 

[Nikosandros]

I'm still planning to have something in Trailblazer, and I definitely took away some good ideas from this thread.

Forgive my ignorance, but is this a system that you are developing?

 

[Wulf Ratbane]

Forgive my ignorance, but is this a system that you are developing?

Yes, sir.

Bad Axe Games » Bad Axe Announces Trailblazer “System Optimizer”

 

[Nikosandros]

Yes, sir.

Bad Axe Games » Bad Axe Announces Trailblazer “System Optimizer”

Very intriguing. Looking forward to it.

 

[mmu1]

Maybe I missed some nuances of this, Wulf, but looking over the system you posted earlier in the thread, the following question occurs to me:

Do you think that under the system you propose, a player has ANY real incentive to play a single or multi-classed non-caster?

 

[Wulf Ratbane]

Maybe I missed some nuances of this, Wulf, but looking over the system you posted earlier in the thread, the following question occurs to me:

Do you think that under the system you propose, a player has ANY real incentive to play a single or multi-classed non-caster?

None at all. In fact Trailblazer is just going to go ahead and remove every class other than the Cleric.

Talk about optimized!