replicant2
First Post
From a review of "Committed," a book about fantasy football in today's Boston Globe Sunday newspaper:
"As St. Amant (the author) discovered, fantasy football is no mere pastime played by dice-rolling Dungeons & Dragons nerds in their parents' basements."
Wnen is this slagging of our hobby going to stop? Worse, the reviewer is unfavorably comparing our game to fantasy football -- a hobby that involves grown men drafting fake football teams, crunching statistics, and pondering phantom trades of players. It's no better and certainly no worse than D&D. In fact, they're both cut from the same cloth -- the creation of make-believe worlds governed by a rules structure.
I guess the difference is that one is based on America's pastime, which makes it "acceptable," while the other will always be a nerd subculture, and thus a target for easy attacks.
"As St. Amant (the author) discovered, fantasy football is no mere pastime played by dice-rolling Dungeons & Dragons nerds in their parents' basements."
Wnen is this slagging of our hobby going to stop? Worse, the reviewer is unfavorably comparing our game to fantasy football -- a hobby that involves grown men drafting fake football teams, crunching statistics, and pondering phantom trades of players. It's no better and certainly no worse than D&D. In fact, they're both cut from the same cloth -- the creation of make-believe worlds governed by a rules structure.
I guess the difference is that one is based on America's pastime, which makes it "acceptable," while the other will always be a nerd subculture, and thus a target for easy attacks.