S
Sunseeker
Guest
You know, I appreciate it when you ignore the second half of my statements, it makes for much more meaningful discussion. That's sarcasm BTW. I also appreciate it when you straw-man my arguments into something they're clearly not. I'd like to talk about these issues, but I really can't when you clearly have some idea in your head of what I'm saying and arguing as opposed to what I'm actually writing.Sure. Taken to the logical conclusion, you could, in essence, run one game for each player. The DPR type plays a dueling game. The skirimisher a tactical game. The diplomancer a negotiation strategy game. The trapfinder a treasure-hunting game. Etc... Meanwhile the other players fiddle with their mobile devices.
Again with that "missing the second half" part. Really? Lots of things can improve the "fun" at the table? Duh. But "fun" is subjective. you cannot objectively increase fun in most cases.Lots of things can. One of them is having everyone participating & engaged, or at least interested, in as much of the game as possible.
Anyway, this will be my last response to you until you respond to what I write instead of what you think I wrote.