A friend of mine recently noticed an interesting difference in the wording of the Warlock's Curse and the Ranger's Quarry. For the curse:
You decide whether to apply the extra damage after making the damage roll.
By contrast, the quarry:
Once per round, you deal extra damage to your quarry.
On a crit, all damage not caused by the crit is maximized. Since the quarry is "extra damage," it is maximized. But since the curse applies AFTER the damage roll, it would seem that a warlock's curse isn't actually maximized on a crit. Here's the sequence of events:
1. You crit
2. You roll damage, which is maximized
3. AFTER the roll, you have an opportunity to say, "I use my curse." Since the (maximized) damage roll has already happened, you have to roll your curse fair and square.
Is this correct? It runs contrary to what seems to be the prevailing opinion. If it's incorrect, why?
You decide whether to apply the extra damage after making the damage roll.
By contrast, the quarry:
Once per round, you deal extra damage to your quarry.
On a crit, all damage not caused by the crit is maximized. Since the quarry is "extra damage," it is maximized. But since the curse applies AFTER the damage roll, it would seem that a warlock's curse isn't actually maximized on a crit. Here's the sequence of events:
1. You crit
2. You roll damage, which is maximized
3. AFTER the roll, you have an opportunity to say, "I use my curse." Since the (maximized) damage roll has already happened, you have to roll your curse fair and square.
Is this correct? It runs contrary to what seems to be the prevailing opinion. If it's incorrect, why?