doctorbadwolf
Heretic of The Seventh Circle
The above, your statement, is what I’m referring to as framing the issue as a discussion between valid points of view.So, what, people are mad because they didn't agree hard enough?
It’s not about agreement. You don’t say that someone who thinks that you aren’t really a person “disagrees” with you. It isn’t a “disagreement”, and when that person is in power, the silence of others is not a case of “not agreeing hard enough”. “Both sides” rhetoric and waffling, talking about respecting others’ regardless of political views as a response to something like what just happened, validates the position in question as a potentially reasonable stance.And, no, I don't think that it frames the issue that way, unless there is something I am misunderstanding.
This isn’t tax policy. It’s human rights.