Paul Farquhar
Legend
Not just Raistlin either. The ranger, Riverwind, was well below the level rangers start getting spells under 1st edition rules. In 5e he would have access to plot-breaking spells.
Not just Raistlin either. The ranger, Riverwind, was well below the level rangers start getting spells under 1st edition rules. In 5e he would have access to plot-breaking spells.
Raistlin really shows up the difference between 1st and 5th edition. Even a 1st level wizard in 5e rules can do more than 3rd level Raistlin could in 1st edition. I seem to recall that the module suggested the same player take both Raistlin and Caramon.
The stats are the same from the original 1e adventures and their "DragonLance Classics" reprint in 2e. They also had 3e DragonLance versions, though they seemed a bit strange. Goldemoon was a "heathen cleric", Riverwind a barbarian3/ranger2, Laurana and Flint had NPC class levels. I'd probably base things off their 1e write-ups.
Most of them their stats can stay as is.
Goldmoon could have cleric levels. She just wouldn't be able to use most of her abilities. Life domain one powers return.
Rangers might need to switch to fighters with background. Most of the classes would be champions, thieves, and maybe invoker's.
None of them would be barbarians. 1E and 2E barbarians were very different.
A 5/5 fighter/mage I would probably convert as something like EK3/wizard 4.
Minor annoyance is modern D&D Elves basically suck with longswords despite it being a racial weapon.
I have the 2E stats if anyone wants them. IIRC they were copy and paste from 1E.
Some classes don't really fit in DL. Warlocks being one example.
Yeah, I think Goldmoon would work just fine as a cleric with no spells or channel divinity for one adventure. I was just wondering if a level or two of 5e bard might also be a good way to emulate her existing skills and almost other-worldly ability to inspire devotion.
I haven't seen the 3e stats for the heroes. That might be interesting.