I wouldn't say no tactics... The use of it's daily is more tactical than the other classes. And the warlock isn't much more tactical. Tactics are most important for controllers and leaders.Looking at the play test Barbarian, which to me looks like all damage and no tact. The Bard should be the opposite, little damage and lots of buffs. A Leader with some controller abilities. IMHO.
I like Warden, myself. Some people like Witch (Primal/Controller), but they're weird.Until now we have the following classes confirmed to PHB2:
Barbarian - Primal/Striker
Bard - Arcane/Leader
Druid - Primal/Controller*
Shaman - Primal/Leader
Sorcerer - Arcane/Controller
*I believe he will be so hybrid as the barbarian is a Striker/Defender Hybrid
And we know which will have a Divine Controller.
Thats lets room to the following options:
Divine/Striker
Primal/Defender
My guesses:
I - Inquisitor - Divine/Striker
T - Theurge - Divine/Controller
W - Warchief - Primal/Defender (only because we don´t have classes with War in the name enough)
I wouldn't say no tactics... The use of it's daily is more tactical than the other classes. And the warlock isn't much more tactical. Tactics are most important for controllers and leaders.
What?? No class? Just a race?Sorry, but I mean "no tact" as in "no class", or no decorum. Not tact as in tactics. Meaning: good for hitting thing, but not for inviting around for dinner, let alone escorting your daughter to the debutant ball.![]()
Or a monster in the campaign setting...I don't know if anybody noticed this or not, but on the Ask the Developer thread on the Forgotten Realms board, Rich Baker mentions a psionic empath. Could the empath be a psionic leader slated for PHB III?