• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

What Are You 12?

I can't answer your question, but I can point out that when you clipped the quotation in your response, you mis-clipped and attributed something I said to Karinsdad. I don't mind, but he might not want to be associated with my ramblings. :)
:) Actually, Karinsdad pretty much implied the same thing in the original post.

I don't know if there's any truth to it. I know I've reached far and wide for inspiration, but never outright copying another's work wholesale. I understand if it's something on Wizard's website, since the ToU of their website explicitly says they may use any ideas posted there for profit without permission. However, I am concerned that there is some element associated with Wizards that may be copying other folks work.

There's been hearsay, but I'd like to start a thread that gathers specific evidence to the unsubstantiated claims to see if there is a pattern...or if it's just a load of wash.

However, I don't know if I'm withing my rights as an ENWorld member to start a thread like that. It just seems like something offensive and would scream "lock me down."
 

log in or register to remove this ad

- Deleted Original Message -

I can remember quite easily when 4e was on its way, and some folks suggested that the problems with the GST were one method by which WotC was attempting to reduce competition. I can also remember quite easily the concern that the GSL doesn't give websites protection in the same way that the OGL does.

Things that make you go "Hmmmm".


RC
 
Last edited:

I have been noticing a trend with WotC that I find somewhat bothersome.

It's as if the company is being run by young teenagers.

Some examples:

1) A friend of mine created a submission to WotC and was denied. A few years later, WotC released a series of books with the major artifact from his submission with not only the same ability, but with the exact same name (and the name is the title of the book).

This is a single legal matter that does not have anything to do with treating people young, or acting young. Any company that deals in intellectual property runs into this sort of thing. It just comes with the territory. Your friend can seek legal advice. It's also possible it's purely coincidence. It happens.

2) The podcasts on WotC web sites are full of foul mouth expletives that I as a business owner would never have associated with my company. And half of the players on the podcasts appear to not know the rules at all.

If it's the podcasts I think you are referring to (you mention players), then it is with a group of people entirely new to D&D in general, and it involves players outside the WOTC company entirely who work for a cartoon company. The whole point of those podcasts was to show demoing of the rules to people new to the rules, so it is no wonder they do not know the rules. As for cussing, they do warn about it, and they are from a cartoon company and not WOTC. That said, they are popular.

3) Any post that is anti-WotC and even slightly controversial on the WotC forums is locked down, often within a matter of hours. Free speech is practically denied if anything negative is said about WotC.

In my experience, this is false. In fact, I would say there is more moderation here, than there. Not that the moderation here is bad (it's not - it's good). Just that I do not find free speech more denied at the WOTC boards or dissent quashed in the way you describe.

4) WotC seems to be threatening a lot of web sites with lawsuits if anyone creates anything useful as a 4E tool. I have a few web sites in my favorites list that no longer exist or have their useful tools available.

They have threatened very few lawsuits, and those they have threatened were against people who pretty blatantly stole their intellectual property. This is not something a 12 year old would do, but something an adult would do. Indeed, the people they are threatening are the ones behaving like 12 year olds in my opinion. Adults pay for licensing, they don't steal content and then whine when they get called on it (not referring to you, but the companies threatened with suits).

It just seems to me that a bunch of young punks are running the show at WotC. Maybe I'm just an old grognard, but I am seeing quite a few things that make me go: hmmmm.

I can understand not liking some of their decisions, but I do not find the reasons you presented compelling.
 

They do tend to let their forums get out of control every once and a while, though...and there are a lot of people who hate them and gravitate there.
I don't really have much to say to the OP that hasn't already been said (forums aren't free speech, hard to draw a line between tool and pirate, etc.), but I will agree with this statement completely. The mods on their boards are extremely lax by EN World's standards, and frankly that is the main draw of EN World to me. This is a MUCH more pleasant environment.

Edit: Lol - ok, maybe right now is not the best time to talk about the environment here at EN World... :)
 
Last edited:

I am fairly certain that WotC is worried that RCFG will dominate the industry in the next few years.

:lol:

(And if you believe that, I have some beachfront property to sell you in Arizona...... :lol:)
 

I am fairly certain that WotC is worried that RCFG will dominate the industry in the next few years.

:lol:

(And if you believe that, I have some beachfront property to sell you in Arizona...... :lol:)

Man Raven... you need a better name for your system. :P

Do you remember econo-buy stuff back in the day? Everytime I see your system I just picture a big solid white book with black lettering- RAVEN CROWKING FANTASY GAME. :D
 


Man Raven... you need a better name for your system. :P

Do you remember econo-buy stuff back in the day? Everytime I see your system I just picture a big solid white book with black lettering- RAVEN CROWKING FANTASY GAME. :D

There are a lot of games with really cool names out there. Mine gets to stand out in comparison. :lol:

Really, though, if I come up with a better name I might switch. If not, "RCFG" is really no worse than some other acronyms out there. I hope. :o

EDIT: And, should I ever make any money out of the project, it is all set: R¢FG. I'm sure I won't need the "$" symbol! ;)

How... how did you discover my secret plan to expand the Gulf of Mexico in order to sell worthless Arizona desert as prime beach front real estate?!? :rant:

Perhaps I've said too much... :angel:

Lex Luthor, is that you?

:lol:


RC
 
Last edited:

Really, though, if I come up with a better name I might switch. If not, "RCFG" is really no worse than some other acronyms out there. I hope. :o

Hah... well true... at least yours doesn't sound like you should be saying "excuse me" right after saying it. (I'm lookin at YOU Steve Jackson!)
 


Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top