It's being panned (unfairly, I think) by the BBC now.
Came across this quote which puzzles me from yahoo, as with a cost of $250 million...
"In light of the theatrical performance of John Carter ($184 million global box office), we expect the film to generate an operating loss of approximately $200 million during our second fiscal quarter ending March 31," the company said in a statement"
I can't quite work out how 250 million - 184 million = 200 million.
But then again, I hear that many apparently successful movies have actually performed SO poorly that the actors on a percentage haven't seen any money, so what do I know