Arguments and assumptions against multi classing

Dannyalcatraz

Schmoderator
Staff member
Supporter
Total coincidence alert: walking into a restaurant post-church today, another patron was walking out wearing a ninja sloth t-shirt.
 

log in or register to remove this ad





Hussar

Legend
I am not saying others cannot or should not do it or interpret them that way. However I would not allow it a game that I am running. For the Three Musketeers and Wesley, I would rule that the oaths falls under ideals and bonds rather than Paladin oaths, because, as you pointed out, they are not doing spell stuff. For Luke, I can see it inspiring a Paladin like order, but to me the Jedi stuff falls more under a psionic or arcane warrior or even a weapon using monk with semi-religious or philosophical overtones. Assuming, there is a jedi influenced order, I as the DM would decide how I want them represented.

Meh. I'm far too lazy. The player comes up with that stuff and calls it a paladin? Fantastic. He now gets homework developing his order and how it works in the world.

Ownership over the world is never one of my priorities.
 




Dannyalcatraz

Schmoderator
Staff member
Supporter
Meh. I'm far too lazy. The player comes up with that stuff and calls it a paladin? Fantastic. He now gets homework developing his order and how it works in the world.

Ownership over the world is never one of my priorities.

You’d probably have loved Antares Whitechapel, Sword of Thoth of the Illuminated Society of Thoth. He was an “arcane Paladin” in a 3.5Ed campaign, and I did exactly that for the DM.

(Yes, multiclassing was involved.)
 

Remove ads

Top