D&D Movie/TV D&D Cinematic Universe. What would it be like? What do you want to see?

Yep, or a group funded by The Twelve being sent on missions and eventually having to challenge their patrons.

Or, basically Leverage, but make it D&D.

Gotta have an artificer. Preferably not Cannith, unless the internal struggle in Cannith is going to be a major plot focus.
Very light on the Nouns though other you get a confusing WOT moments.
Basically an investigator who over early episodes joins with artificer, a warforged and such, slowly adding the odd Word each episode.
 

log in or register to remove this ad


Levistus's_Leviathan

5e Freelancer
I think characters like Themberchard are inspired. Maybe the bad guys and adventure locations are D&Ds “characters” for a DCU.
That's a great point. The villains in D&D are central to the experience, and if you cast that right (I think Hugh Grant was a stroke of casting genius for the first film) the rest may fall into place easier. And this dovetails with how 5e runs APs anyhow.
Yeah, this is a really great point. While D&D doesn't really have the huge roster of popular pre-tested heroes like the MCU has (excluding the Drizzt, Elminster, and Dragonlance novels), it certainly does have quite a few pre-tested villains that could work very well. A lot of people complain about the MCU having boring villains with identical power sets to the main heroes. That's not a problem for many of the main villains in D&D's history, like Orcus, Demogorgon, Vecna, Strahd, and Tiamat.

Obviously making the villains not "boring" will mostly be down to acting, choreography, and how the character is written, but I strongly doubt that anyone would accuse Demogorgon or Tiamat of being boring in live-action.
 
Last edited:

OB1

Jedi Master
Yeah, this is a really great point. While D&D doesn't really have the huge roster of popular pre-tested heroes like the MCU has (excluding the Drizzt, Elminster, and Dragonlance novels), it certainly does have quite a few pre-tested villains that could work very well. A lot of people complain about the MCU having boring villains with identical power sets to the main heroes. That's not a problem for many of the main villains in D&D's history, like Orcus, Demogorgon, Vecna, Strahd, and Tiamat.

Obviously making the villains not "boring" will mostly be down to acting, choreography, and how the character is written, but I strongly doubt that anyone would accuse Demogorgon or Tiamat of being boring in live-action.
With just 4 pieces of info we could probably come up with a few dozen potential entries into the DaDCU.

Setting: Sigil
Genre: Political-thriller
Villain: Asmodeus
Played by: Keanu Reeves
 


doctorbadwolf

Heretic of The Seventh Circle
Very light on the Nouns though other you get a confusing WOT moments.
Basically an investigator who over early episodes joins with artificer, a warforged and such, slowly adding the odd Word each episode.
I disagree. Treat it like a sci fi show. The audience doesn’t need to know what an artificer is, they’ll figure it out as they watch, via context.
 

TwiceBorn2

Adventurer
The advantage they have (IMO) is that they don't have to tightly tie the stories together, but still have a chance for a Tier IV crossover event to save the 'fundamental order of the multiverse' with heroes from different settings/movies coming together, but that still requires the audience falling in love with those characters in the first place.
I'm really tired of "save the world/universe/multiverse" type stories. I much prefer a localized focus -- defend the village, the barony, or a small realm. I prefer personal stakes to global/universal/multiversal stakes. Those kinds of over the top stories make it harder for me to fall in love with the characters... just because I start out annoyed by the main premise underlying the script.

I realize that I'm probably part of a small minority that feels that way.
 




Remove ads

Top