Statement on OGL from WotC

Wizards of the Coast has made a short statement regarding the ongoing rumors surrounding OneD&D and the Open Gaming License. In a short response to Comicbook.com, the company said "We will continue to support the thousands of creators making third-party D&D content with the release of One D&D in 2024. While it is certain our Open Game License (OGL) will continue to evolve, just as it has...

Wizards of the Coast has made a short statement regarding the ongoing rumors surrounding OneD&D and the Open Gaming License. In a short response to Comicbook.com, the company said "We will continue to support the thousands of creators making third-party D&D content with the release of One D&D in 2024. While it is certain our Open Game License (OGL) will continue to evolve, just as it has since its inception, we're too early in the development of One D&D to give more specifics on the OGL or System Reference Document (SRD) at this time."

wizards-of-the-coast-companyupdate-1614278964279-1756307320.jpg



It's not clear what WotC means when they say that the OGL will 'continue to evolve' -- while there have been two versions of the license released over the years, each is non-rescindible so people are free to use whichever version of the license they wish. Indeed, that is written into the license itself -- "Wizards or its designated Agents may publish updated versions of this License. You may use any authorized version of this License to copy, modify and distribute any Open Game Content originally distributed under any version of this License."

During the D&D 4th Edition era, WotC published a new, separate license called the Game System Licence (GSL). While it was used by third party publishers, it was generally upopular.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

JEB

Legend
huh... I just looked at my 3.5 PHB and I can't find that sidebar anywhere. Maybe I got a different printing?
Looks like it's on page 4, "Why a revision?" Third paragraph says:

If this is your first experience with D&D, we welcome you to a wonderful world of adventure and imagination. If you used the prior version of this book, rest assured that this revision is a testament to our dedication to continuous product improvement. We’ve updated errata, clarified rules, and made the game even better than it was. But also rest assured that this is an upgrade of the d20 System, not a new edition of the game. This revision is compatible with all existing products, and those products can be used with the revision with only minor adjustments.
 

log in or register to remove this ad




leafaiden

Villager

Oh no. Is this still going on?!?
Like a zombie.. yes, apparently it is. Only some of the names have changed.

My summary of the court cases and how I think it applies here...

"Those are some nice contributions you made to this table top game. We don't agree with some of those features. They were added in the wrong. We are suing to remove that|those|this."
 

I wonder if there is some project of D&D-One to be not only a VTT but later a game-plataform as Little-Big-Planet, Playstation's Dreams, Roblox, Core(by Manticore Games) or the comingsoon Fortnite: Creative Mode 2.0. I don't say this to be wrong.

Digital market doesn't need cost to print and sending to the shops. Hasbro wants to be for the digital market. I don't blame. They don't only to make money, but also to pay a lot of bills and taxes.

D&D needs the 3PPs because these can add a lot of new and fresh ideas, for crunch and new-brand settings. Maybe someone of these will be acquired by WotC in the future, or by some videogame studio, or a streaming service to produce an adaptation.
 

delericho

Legend
Isn't that kind of a problem? I would have expected a corporation like Hasbro to be dealing with IP legalities/questions in the very early phases of a project.
It's a problem if they don't know (in broad terms) what they're doing. But there's no particular reason to be concerned about them not sharing that with us.
 




Remove ads

Remove ads

Top