OGL 1.2 survey is now live

[darjr]

OGL 1.2 Feedback Survey

OGL 1.2 Feedback Survey.

survey.alchemer.com

 

[darjr]

No DnDBeyond account required

@Morrus

 

[Jer]

Might want to wait for a bit - lots of folks on that Twitter thread saying they're having errors with the survey.

(Borked website or just overloaded with folks eager to give Wizards a piece of their mind? Who can say?)

 

[darjr]

Also they have some updates in twitter . Can someone get them?

 

[Jer]

Also they have some updates in twitter . Can someone get them?

Here you go:

My response to them when I get a chance is going to be an explanation of why they need to go back and look at the d20 STL and realize that everything they say they're trying to do with this 1.2 OGL can be done with the OGL 1.0a intact and the addition of a new trademark license to indicate Wizards approval rather than pushing both of these things into the same license. This is a solved problem and it was solved 23 years ago - they just stopped using the STL.

That doesn't stop the things that are problems for them that they aren't saying out loud. But hey, I'll give them a solution to their problem since they're asking for it.

 

[Nikosandros]

I'll grant Wizards this. The survey seems honest to me. They ask all the questions that I thought were necessary to discuss the issue.

 

[The Stray]

is someone willing to screenshot the questions so we can all rip them a new bunghole discuss them and provide critique?

 

[kenada]

I'll grant Wizards this. The survey seems honest to me. They ask all the questions that I thought were necessary to discuss the issue.

I managed to get through it, and I agree. The questions were all pretty reasonable. I did have to ask if they could release a 4e SRD under CC-BY. One can hope, right?

 

[Riley]

Some seemingly-well-thought-out responses (thread):

 

[SirGalrim]

Nice. I have given my feedback. I think OGL 1.2 looks pretty good, and great using CCA4. There is still room for a few improvements.