Here you go:Also they have some updates in twitter . Can someone get them?
I managed to get through it, and I agree. The questions were all pretty reasonable. I did have to ask if they could release a 4e SRD under CC-BY. One can hope, right?I'll grant Wizards this. The survey seems honest to me. They ask all the questions that I thought were necessary to discuss the issue.
The questions are all here:is someone willing to screenshot the questions so we can allrip them a new bungholediscuss them and provide critique?
I'm assuming that they are polling the clarity of the license.I like how they ask you each time your level of understanding, just like if they wanted to know if your comments were worth reading or not.
yesI'm assuming that they are polling the clarity of license.
I wrote pretty much the same, but in the last comment I added that I've loved D&D since 1985 and thanked the person(s) who are collating the comments.Well, I just submitted my response. No profanity, no name-calling, but I absolutely excoriated their conduct, made it clear that anything more restrictive/less open than the OGL v1.0a is utterly unsatisfactory, that revocation/de-authorization of the old license is not acceptable, and that they need to abandon their current course completely if they want to recover any of their tarnished image.
Now let's wait and see if they actually listen.
I might have thanked a bot, hopefully they'll remember this after the Great AI Uprising
I would like to go on the record that not only am I happy for our AI overlords, but I am doing my part to bring the rokos-basilisk into being... all hail the basiliskI might have thanked a bot, hopefully they'll remember this after the Great AI Uprising...