Apologies,
@BlueFin , I missed that someone responded to you when it was probably meant to be me.
So. I still have not read the other post, but I chose to answer this one.
I have a big problem with you telling otgers what "the truth" is. And that others conveniently ignore that.
I actually consider that dismissive.
People ca look at the same facts and draw different conclusions. Until we get a statement from someone inside, tgat destroying 3pp was the goal, I don't think that is what happened.
No, the problem is that so many here are saying "It's not greed!" because "It has to be this way, that's how this works!" as if that's a defense when it's really
not. I'm not dismissing anyone, I'm pointing out that their point really doesn't preclude mine. Instead, they are just walking away from what I'm saying, not wanting to recognize it for what it is. They'd rather just not address it and move on than recognize it for what it is.
I think, it really started to be a shield vs BIG 3pp and Disney etc. Building a competitor product. Disney could decide to buy a big 3pp producer and build a competing product. It would not be the first time that happened.
Disney is already producing RPGs. This defense by Wizards was inane before and continues to be as such.
Then I think, they thinking, when we are at it, we can prevent NuTSR stuff at the same time. And then it went downhill.
None of this would prevent NuTSR. None of it. Not a wink. NuTSR is already doing something that is
illegal. Nothing that Wizards is doing can do anymore than what the law is
already doing.
Again, let's get away from the NuTSR stuff. It's a deflection and a bad one. Kyle Brink couldn't give an example of anything in OGL harming the company and specifically said it to prevent future issues. That's a bad justification, but at least it's more logical than trying to put this on some ineffectual racists who have done nothing to hurt Wizards and are arguably useful to Wizards as a punching bag because, well, who doesn't like to see idiot racists get messed up?
I don't see any scenario, where destroying the whole 3pp market would have been a good business decision.
I mean, I do. You need to maximize profits and move people away from content alternatives because you are using a new monetizations strategy and if you give people non-monetized alternatives, they could go for them. Why use the Wizards VTT that has a bunch of monetizing when VTTs let me upload my Hero Forge STLs? Why pay for an animation when I can get it for free? Why pay a monthly fee for a subscription that gives out a little bit of content when I can get whole books of it at a better price?
If you are going to try and do a hard monetization strategy, having alternatives gives people places to go that isn't you. You don't want that, you want people trapped with you. If you are EA, you don't want some other company doing a better, cheaper, possibly-free version of Ultimate Team Madden. That's why you lock down that license.
That's the reasoning. That doesn't make it a
good business decision, but it is definitely one that
So that is my take. I don't want to be called out as someone ignoring "the truth" for convenience.
And yet, that's kind of what people are doing? People see the matter as done and don't want to talk about it anymore. People are quick to want to move on. Fine, go ahead. No one is dragging people into these arguments. You don't
need to defend Wizards, you can just move on and enjoy life.