WotC Anyone Else Tired of the Wizards Bashing?

[Vaalingrade]

pretty sure the law would agree however

Let's fill the prisons, boys!

 

[Raiztt]

Something they were given in exchange for legal tender.

But not THEIR legal tender, someone ELSES legal tender. You said the delivery goes to the wrong house.

 

[FitzTheRuke]

Something they were given in exchange for legal tender.

Sorry... what? They paid for the food that was given to them by mistake? Now I'm not following you.

 

[Raiztt]

Let's fill the prisons, boys!

100% - turn them into work camps even.

 

[Bacon Bits]

Would you care to explain that or would doing so break forum rules for making things personal?

An unsual number of Magic players in multiple threads on the Magic subreddit and on Magic Twitter took WotC's side roughly a day after the Pinkerton incident broke. They kept repeating everything that WotC did was entirely justified and without any moral or ethical concerns, and that Cannon was absolutely and without doubt a thief because he didn't answer the phone and let the Pinkertons in.

It was very bizarre. I'd almost believe they were sock puppets for a PR crisis response.

Edit: TTRPG Twitter responded with a collective and

 

[Raiztt]

Sorry... what? They paid for the food that was given to them by mistake? Now I'm not following you.

I believe he's saying that because the food was paid for by someone it's not theft.

 

[mamba]

The FTC disagrees with you. If he bought them from a retailer, then he bought them. If he was shipped them in error, then he still owns them.

interesting, well, he can take this up with WotC's lawyer, pretty sure they have something they can throw at him over this

 

[Aldarc]

Sorry... what? They paid for the food that was given to them by mistake? Now I'm not following you.

Still stuck on that burrito side conversation?

An unsual number of Magic players in multiple threads on the Magic subreddit and on Magic Twitter took WotC's side roughly a day after the Pinkerton incident broke. They kept repeating everything that WotC did was entirely justified and without any moral or ethical concerns, and that Cannon was absolutely and without doubt a thief because he didn't answer the phone and let the Pinkertons in.

It was very bizarre. I'd almost believe they were sock puppets for a PR crisis response.

Thank you for the clarification. I had no idea where you were going with that.

 

[trappedslider]

An unsual number of Magic players in multiple threads on the Magic subreddit and on Magic Twitter took WotC's side roughly a day after the Pinkerton incident broke. They kept repeating everything that WotC did was entirely justified and without any moral or ethical concerns, and that Cannon was absolutely and without doubt a thief because he didn't answer the phone and let the Pinkertons in.

It was very bizarre. I'd almost believe they were sock puppets for a PR crisis response.

it's almost like one group of fans are willing to overlook WotC's past actions (the whole 30th-anniversary nonsense) since they more than likely don't know nor care what the OGL fiasco is/was instead of being fixated on it.

 

[LeviKornelsen]

He bought a different magic set, not the one he received...

Then he very likely has the right to both keep that set AND demand the one he ordered, as the law is set up.

Shipping problems rest with the shipper.