Tony Vargas
Legend
Not that familiar with music history, I suppose the music was whatever the people making it called it. And why wouldn't we respect their take on their own art?(B) It was Jazz but just not known by that name
Not that familiar with music history, I suppose the music was whatever the people making it called it. And why wouldn't we respect their take on their own art?(B) It was Jazz but just not known by that name
Not that familiar with music history, I suppose the music was whatever the people making it called it.
Quite the opposite. It's nature doesn't change because someone made a new conceptual box or pigeon hole that it could fit in.It just seems an odd take to me that a thing can be sitting there, and it's nature changes when someone gives it a new name - even if no other property of it changed.
Quite the opposite. It's nature doesn't change because someone made a new conceptual box or pigeon hole that it could fit in.
0D&D was a wargame. That didn't change because a new category was created that it also fit into (a new category created, for it to fit into). Nor does being designed, published, and played as a wargame deny it's membership in that new category.
I think we should tax people who stand in water.
Monty Python’s Flying Circus. S02E02. I think.Ok. I'm curious now.
0D&D was a wargame. After it was created, it was also called an RPG, a category invented for it, and since then many more RPGs have been created, and the category is huge, the definition expansive, and few games today called TTRPGs, share the with 0D&D, the qualities that made it a wargame. Likewise, very few of 0D&D's fellow wargames could be called RPGs, even in retrospect, in spite of sharing many qualities with it.So OD&D is also an RPG?
So what something is based entirely on what it's called?Not that familiar with music history, I suppose the music was whatever the people making it called it. And why wouldn't we respect their take on their own art?