Actually didn't they say at this time there are no plans to reprint? However that doesn't mean they aren't evaluating whether that is a good or bad idea, the logistics of it, etc. But if there are no plans right now that's all they can say at that moment even if it could change in a few hours.Early in the thread we saw that NZ game distributors had directly talked to WotC and told them they wouldn't be reprinting. So they are as "intelligent" as they are going to get, having looked at their options, picked one, and communicated it to game distributors.
So at this point it would be "speaking slowly and intelligently", yet they are still not doing that.
and where do you think the distributor got that from, are they making it up?
show me the evidence
unless there are DDB developers on there saying that the cause for the bugs is that they needed to implement the new features in a week, that is not evidence but speculation at best.Go read the DDB forums...
Does anyone on this thread own a hobby store in the affected area? Do we know what the communication to them has been? Because I'm seeing a lot of second hand information and guessing along with typical trashing WotC happening when we just don't know the full story.
If they are still working on it it wasn't fully implemented in a week... it's been ongoing.unless there are DDB developers on there saying that the cause for the bugs is that they needed to implement the new features in a week, that is not evidence but speculation at best.
I am not looking for evidence that there are bugs, I am looking for evidence that the last minute changes are responsible for them… Even then, they got it done in a week, some bugs notwithstanding, so I still maintain that it was not a large effort to implement this.
My perspective then was that we would see whether it is a large effort or not by whether they would get it implemented in a week or not, the other side was arguing it would take them several weeks and they would miss the deadline because of that. This decidedly did not happen… so yeah, I am comfortable with saying I was correct on that one
bugfixes are always ongoing, they rolled it out, that was the criteria. The argument was there was no way for them to get it done and they would miss the date, not that there still might be some bugs left to squashIf they are still working on it it wasn't fully implemented in a week... it's been ongoing.
It was missing basic functionality. By your definition as long as they claimed it was implemented... it was.bugfixes are always ongoing, they rolled it out, that was the criteria. The argument was there was no way for them to get it done and they would miss the date, not that there still might need to be some bugs to squash
And again... a statement was made, thee is a delay in the release date of the books. It is not the statement some want I guess...