Spoilers Rings of Power is back!


log in or register to remove this ad





If we have to see every single moment on screen, just so no one's wondering when the halflings go to the bathroom, we're going to need a lot more episodes.
In many cases, this could have been eased by the showrunners inserting a single, brief scene which aided continuity, e.g.:

Miriel’s Numenorians arrive in the Southlands. They begin a cavalry charge. Where? Why?

Insert: Brief scene describing/demonstrating/alluding to an orc attack on a nearby settlement.

This pattern - where a gap exists between the apparent understanding of the actors and their actions - is a recurring problem with this show.
 

So my girlfriend insisted to watch the remaining episodes. Were now done with Season 2. It might be some of the worst television I've watched.

Season 1 felt soulless but inoffensive. Some major departures from the lore immediately killed the show for me, but I was able to non-chalantly cruise through it.

Season 2 has a bit more personality, but it's so, so bad. The writing is absolutely atrocious. You can guess the characters line before they come, the punchlines are so bad. And they're unable to build anything with any emotional charge without winking a Jackson's work.

Sauron: "The door is still open."
Galadriel: "The door is shut."
Epic music ensues as they resume fighting.

It's really bad. And it's not not lore accurate. It's actively going against so many lore elements that made these stories so interesting in the first place. Tolkien's work has a poetry to it. This feels like a room of kids writing poetry for the first time.

I'll give the show some credit. I abhor the final product, but it's obvious lots of love went into many aspects of the show.
  • The music is great.
  • I love the costumes and the visual quality.
  • Some actors are really strong, especially with the text they have to work with. Elrond, Durin (King), Celebrimbor especially. I was unconvinced by the actor of Sauron in the first season, but he played the fine line of Sauron's role exceptionally well. I'm still unsure if he enjoyed his time with Celebrimbor or was just manipulating him.
  • I like Sauron's depiction.
  • I dislike the new Adar's actor, but I like the character.
  • The opening sequence is lovely.
 


I'm with Dr. Olsen . . . there is no canon in Middle-Earth.

 

I'm with Dr. Olsen . . . there is no canon in Middle-Earth.


The Article said:
In a lore-focused interview released by Prime Video, Dr. Corey Olsen, dubbed ‘The Tolkien Professor,’ offers his thoughts on this most vociferous of debates.

Do you think Prime Video compensated Olsen for his time and work?

I think it’s also worth pointing out that it was Olsen who dubbed Olsen “The Tolkien Professor” - it’s not like it was somehow acquired through popular accolade.

A couple of thoughts:

1. I think it's worth drawing a distinction between "canonicity" and "lore authentic to Tolkien's vision."

2. There is a difference between Tolkien constantly tinkering with his own work, and a TV studio reconfiguring large tranches of it. It's Tolkien's to tinker with, after all.

But as I've suggested, I think it's a mistake to try and reconcile anything in RoP with Tolkien's legendarium. It's harder than trying to harmonize the gospels.

Edit: which gives rise to another point. Canon may contradict itself, but it remains canon.
 
Last edited:

Remove ads

Top