What are you reading in 2025?

it might be the best book I've read since Jonathan Strange & Mr. Norrell.
Speaking of which, I finally got the ebook from my library - I've never read it! And it was an unknown book to me. For some reason Jonathan Strange & Mr. Norrell is not very well known in Germany and it surprised me to learn that it is appereantly quite the classic - and its 20 years old! It was for 1-2 years on my list and I've always assumed it came out just like 6-8 years ago.

Read the first two chapters and immediately returned it - to buy the hardcover print version. I already loved it, but want to read it in print because those footnotes are annoying on e-reader. Really looking forward to devour this, its right up my alley.

On another side I am reading "I am glad my Mom died" by Jennette McCurdy. She was the only reason to watch "iCarly" from time to time as a young teenager. The book reads almost like a novel and is a series of chronological snippets from her childhood as a child actress under the thumb of her narcisstic mom who pushed her into the business (and into eating disorders). Its incredible that she managed to write a funny book about these horrifiying experiences.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

"I Am Glad My Mom Died" has an incredibly good reputation. It made a huge splash in Southern California when it landed, given how many would-be actors are out here, including many who moved out with their moms (usually) during pilot season.
 

I found the big initial change (magical grad school rather than magical college) to be a rough change. The characters do some awful stuff to each other throughout the novels, and making them older made some of their choices harder to forgive watching the tv show. It made them seem careless rather than callow.
Yeah, I think an important part of the novels is that these are college students and they emerge into a post-collegiate life they aren't prepared for and which doesn't live up to their expectations. The beginning of the second book just aches with "this is not what everyone had promised my life would be like, all of my life," which I found deeply resonant.

Having them be 25-year-old douchebags going through a magical quarter-life crisis makes them a lot less sympathetic.
 
Last edited:

I'm glad my mom died - double thumbs up, if you like memoirs. CW for eating disorders and narcissistic parents.

Gateway, have read at least twice, but not within past 10 years. Seems it could very much could be run as some sort of West Marches campaign with rules-set of choice. @Autumnal why Starforged as opposed to say, Traveller?
 

Because I like Starforged more than I ever liked Traveller, and it has excellent support for the kind of campaign it’d be. Others can do as suits them. I won’t complain. Much.
 

I’ve just wrapped a couple audiobooks on the Roman republic.

The Storm Before The Storm, by Mike Duncan, read by him. This must be the 4th-5th time I’ve started this, but I kept getting interrupted by life stuff. Not this time! It runs from the aftermath of the Punic Wars (about which I’ll say a bit more below) to the end of Sulla’s time as dictator, fifty-sixty years from the 130s BC to 80 BC. Duncan is a very good storyteller and narrator, and it’s a lively book.

Mortal Republic: How Rome Fell Into Tyranny, by Edward J. Watts, read by Matt Kugler. This is a more expansive book, starting with Pyrrhus’ invasion of southern Italy in 280 BC and running forward to the assassination of Julius Caesar and its aftermath in 44-43 BC. He has a specific argument to make, too, which I’ll also describe below. This is a more emotionally intense book than Duncan’s and Kuglar does a great job conveying that sense of impending disaster that might have been avoided, but not by these principal players.

The last two centuries of the Roman republic are the story of the dog catching the car, repeatedly. In the preceding three centuries, it grew from a single town to ruling an increasingly large fraction of the peninsula, and mostly made it work. Frays in the seams about precisely what social position to allow the “allies”, the subjects outside Rome, were accumulating, but would probably have gotten resolved if the republic hadn’t kept enlarging.

But it did.

This happened again and again: “Grr! We’re being threatened/harassed by the Cimbrians/Greeks/Cathaginians/etc and we’ve got to put a stop to that! Stomp stomp stomp stomp, because we’ve got the best ideology and logistics around! Yay, we won! Um. Now what do we do with these guys and all their stuff?” And they never did arrive at a better answer than making more and more the swag the personal loot of winning commanders and their replacements every few years.

Watts has a thesis: The republic worked when it had a monopoly on the rewards that people could earn via extraordinary service to it. Offices, triumphs, public memorials like statuary, ongoing privileges for oneself and one’s heirs, all this was under the control of the state, so that one’s peers and rivals had a say in what came of your being the best around at something. This broke down with geographical expansion, as more of the state’s work required people to be further away for longer periods of time. Purely personal kingdoms of wealth and power built up on the frontiers because they had to. Effective review could only be a sometimes thing, and over just a few generations, sums of money, troops under one’s direct command, and the like grew by literally orders of magnitude. In the final 2-3 republican generations, there were guys with resources directly comparable to the emperors coming up later. And there are limitation how much you can govern someone at that point if they don’t want you to govern them.

(Why, yes, in this book published in 2020, Watts does have things to say about modern problems of politics and society.)

It’s fascinating and tragic to watch a fairly stable aristocracy that could have become more democratic (and occasionally did!) crumble under the weight of problems that could probably only ever really get solved by the most successful people voluntarily passing up whole categories of self-enrichment.
Have you read Colleen McCullough's First Man in Rome series? Historical fiction and certainly not unbiased in how the famous people are portrayed, but still i found quite a fascinating read covering the likes of Marius, Sulla, Pompey, Julius Caesar etc. I found it somewhat of a slow read, especially first couple of books, compared to other series (e.g. Malazan) with similar page counts.
 


Red Sonja - Consumed - by Gail Simone
Acclaimed comics writer Gail Simone's first prose book. Liked it; liked it a lot. It's what you want from Red Sonja, which is what I'd expect from someone who's written her in comic form before. She shows up, bad decisions and chaos ensue, darkness is put to the sword, and much ale is consumed (not the point of the title).

Burning Paradise by Robert Charles Wilson
Honestly, I'd skim this one for the background material.

The initial premise is neat: It is 2015 but the world is more like the mid-Sixties in tech level. There was a WW1 but nothing big after that:: no WW2, no Cold War, No Hitler, No massive genocides, no atom bomb and arms race, etc. No space race, either. We have not put a satellite in orbit. Computers are the size of refrigerators. There is crime and there is saber-rattling and there are small conflicts here and there, but in general the world is peaceful and prosperous.

The reason for this is that the ionosphere is a living creature. It is not sentient per se or if it is, it's a level or type of sentience we really cannot detect. It keeps it's existence secret and monitors all radio traffic, which effectively means all communication except for speaking and snail mail. All it really 'wants' is to breed and die. It came here millennia ago and it's children and on the way to distant stars and planets as we speak. It's kept our tech level at a manageable level instead of giving a toddler the loaded nuclear gun. There are people who know it's true nature and want to destroy it.

Two chapters in and you'll know the ending of this book, if the title doesn't technically give it away.

The Forest of Lost Souls - Dean Koontz.
I guess every so often you're going to deliver a clunker no matter all the great stuff you've done in the past. I haven't read the majority of Koontz's work but I'll tell you - I'm on the fence on whether or not he even wrote this. It's a pretty good book up until the ending chapters and then the wheels just come right off. It's like it was meant to be twice as long and then Something Happened and he had to end it right in the middle.

There's no overt supernatural element here no matter how often it's semi-teased save for The Old Fortuneteller, who might simply be amazingly perceptive about people. Some of the character work and background material is interesting and could serve for some character inspiration for your RPG.
 

Just finished Discworld 05, Sourcery, by Terry Pratchett. This took a lot longer to finish than the others so far. Not quite tedious, but definitely slower for me. Not a fan of high magic, so a book all about how awesome and limitless magic…sorry, sourcery…is was always going to be difficult. Might need to read someone else for a bit as a palette cleanser then come back to the series after a break.
 

Just finished Discworld 05, Sourcery, by Terry Pratchett. This took a lot longer to finish than the others so far. Not quite tedious, but definitely slower for me. Not a fan of high magic, so a book all about how awesome and limitless magic…sorry, sourcery…is was always going to be difficult. Might need to read someone else for a bit as a palette cleanser then come back to the series after a break.
It's not one of his better books, although it's Unseen University assembling in its final form (Ridcully is introduced in this one, right?). Things pick up with Wyrd Sisters (#6) and especially Guards, Guards (#8).
 
Last edited:

Remove ads

Top