Thomas Shey
Legend
My wife and I were talking about this week's episode and I argued that Invincible is really a very conventional Superman story, just drilling down on two things: 1) How tough Superman's villains need to be to challenge him in combat (which is why the best Superman stories tend to be ones where they attack him through other means) and 2) the consequences of being Superman, including the collateral damage and all the people he cannot save, no matter how hard he tries.
These are things that DC doesn't want to fully engage in -- they don't want to talk themselves out of the Superman business any more than they want to send Bruce Wayne to therapy and let him resolve his issues in other ways -- but yeah, at the end of the day, Invincible is basically Kirkman trying to win an argument in his local comic book shop, plus jokes and a great cast.
Yeah. The thing is, its easy to see Invincible as deconstructionist, but other than that one abandoned convention in combat, its really not (and even that convention is sometimes finessed; I can think of a couple cases where people kept living with damage they probably shouldn't have with what we know about their particulars, they just got to do it after taking gruesome injuries that'd probably wouldn't have occurred outside an Iron Age style comic (which Invincible really isn't).