And heavy ropes even lower.Chains are a slightly lower tech alternative to steel cables.
And heavy ropes even lower.Chains are a slightly lower tech alternative to steel cables.
As @aramis erak said, ropes are too stretchy for most heavy engineering purposes (unless you use fantasy materials).And heavy ropes even lower.
The issue with natural fiber (and most synthetic fiber) ropes is springiness vs friction+inertia. On a long enough run, the rope won't move the train for up to several seconds, then elastic rebound jerks as inertia is overcome... whiplash is not fun.And heavy ropes even lower.
As @aramis erak said, ropes are too stretchy for most heavy engineering purposes (unless you use fantasy materials).
I understand perfectly. However, the reality is, even if a material is flawed, it may still be the best thing available for the purpose. After all, heavy hemp mooring ropes were the maritime standard for centuries for reasons, even (or especially) for the largest of ships.The issue with natural fiber (and most synthetic fiber) ropes is springiness vs friction+inertia. On a long enough run, the rope won't move the train for up to several seconds, then elastic rebound jerks as inertia is overcome... whiplash is not fun.
Also, if the rope's elastic limit is reached before overcoming friction+inertia, the rope snaps and can potentially kill; wire is more deadly when it snaps, but modern cable car cables are strong enough that the cable-clamp breaks before the cable. Still, SF has to retension frequently due to cable stretch. (IIRC, weekly.)
Elasticity is good on a belay line, bad on a hoist line or motive line.
I've seen the USN training film of a beautiful #3 catch-wire trap (carrier's aircraft arresting gear) failing and causing an involuntary bolter (missed landing) ... and slicing a crewman where he shouldn't have been in half... just before the camera takes the other end. It was either Korea or 'Nam era. I knew a nam era photographers mate - he lost a camera to a trap-wire fail.I understand perfectly. However, the reality is, even if a material is flawed, it may still be the best thing available for the purpose. After all, heavy hemp mooring ropes were the maritime standard for centuries for reasons, even (or especially) for the largest of ships.
Hell, even today, when nylons and other synthetics have replaced hemp in mooring ropes for the most part, ropes are still what’s used for tying of ships in modern times. And yes, they DO fail- sometimes, spectacularly. Lethally.
I was trying to find the AI-narrated safety PSA I coincided just watched a couple days ago of mooring systems failing but couldn’t. In it, you see things like mooring posts being launched like cannonballs into the sides of ships pulling away from the dock as well as people being knocked down by flailing broken ropes. One clip included a safety demo of a test dummy cut in half by a large broken mooring rope end whipping through the air.
But ropes still get used, probably because of cost and weight issues.
...It would be very tricky for people wearing armour and carrying metal items...
Always moving, you say?As for mooring lines, the give is a benefit there. Or so my Naval Science I-IV instructors kept telling us. The sea is never truly still, and you need that give when moored to the dock, because the ship's also always moving... at the very least, up and down with the tides.
Pater Noster is presumably also a prayer a Christian might say before getting into one of those apparent deathtraps.My university library had a paternoster. Terrifying thing, I took the stairs.