trappedslider
Legend
Could be good, I see Fisher is back
Well, it's got Ilsa Fisher.this franchise doesn't have any strong points.
I'm more of a Lizzy Caplan gal myself, but then, that's probably surprising to exactly nobody.Well, it's got Ilsa Fisher.
You wouldn't think so, right?So… people want more of this?
Yes that's what is very bizarre. I was expecting there to be like a twist in the first one where at least one of them was like, an actual wizard, but that didn't happen.This series still doesn't seem to know whether it's about stage magic, actual magic, or some CGI mishmash of the two.
Somehow both of them grossed over $300m worldwide on "moderate to high" budgets - i.e. $75m to $120m. So technically they made money? Maybe not a crazy amount but positive cashflow.
Yeah maybe this is a demonstration that star power is still a thing, but you need to assemble a whole crew of low-A through high-C tier actors and combine it with an anodyne and inoffensive premise and simple "luxury"-oriented visual style to make it work? That's essentially what Ocean's Eleven did.They all seem to do about as well as the Ocean's Eleven movies (which I thought were a class better than these). Honestly, this just feels like some producer saying "We need a heist movie, and we need X budget", and it doesn't need too much more thought than that.
Yeah maybe this is a demonstration that star power is still a thing, but you need to assemble a whole crew of low-A through high-C tier actors and combine it with an anodyne and inoffensive premise and simple "luxury"-oriented visual style to make it work? That's essentially what Ocean's Eleven did.
(Ocean's Eight, the all-female version also worked, making $300m on a $70m budget with an identical formula. But it had James Corden in it so must be disregarded, ugh. Why not pick literally any other British actor?)